From: David Collier-Brown <davec-b@rogers.com>
To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bloat] US Weighs Banning TP-Link Router
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 10:43:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bc717f59-f1a2-4d43-a7d7-2cd3dc438c33@rogers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pss4488n-309r-ss28-r8nq-31854n32s59p@ynat.uz>
Yay!
--dave
On 12/18/24 10:27, David Lang via Bloat wrote:
> tp=link is in the process of splitting off their US operations (I was
> looking at getting a job there), which would seem to bypass this problem.
>
> David Lang
>
> On Wed, 18 Dec 2024, David Collier-Brown via Bloat wrote:
>
>> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 10:04:52 -0500
>> From: David Collier-Brown via Bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
>> Reply-To: David Collier-Brown <davec-b@rogers.com>
>> To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> Subject: Re: [Bloat] US Weighs Banning TP-Link Router
>>
>> Previous claims, from August 2024:
>>
>> therecord.media
>>
>> Routers from China-based TP-Link a national security threat, US
>> lawmakers claim <#>
>>
>> The two members of Congress called on the Commerce Department to
>> investigate risks related to TP-Link routers amid concerns over
>> state-backed Chinese hacking operations.
>>
>> 🔗
>> https://therecord.media/routers-from-tp-link-security-commerce-department
>> <https://therecord.media/routers-from-tp-link-security-commerce-department>
>>
>>
>> On 12/18/24 09:54, David Collier-Brown via Bloat wrote:
>>>
>>> I see, from Slashdot, that the US is considering banning TP-Link
>>> routers, as a security risk.
>>>
>>> Most can run OpenWRT: should we be petitioning the Commerce
>>> Department or it's equivalent to require existing TP-Link routers be
>>> migrated to OpenWRT? And I'd suggest, while /retaining their settings/.
>>>
>>> --dave
>>> (I used to do fixed-price source-to-source ports at Sun, so this is
>>> possible)
>>>
>>> news.slashdot.org
>>>
>>> US Weighs Banning TP-Link Router Over National Security Concerns -
>>> Slashdot <#>
>>>
>>> U.S. authorities are investigating Chinese router manufacturer
>>> TP-Link over national security risks and considering banning its
>>> devices, WSJ reported Wednesday, citing sources familiar with the
>>> matter. The Commerce, Defense and Justice departments have launched
>>> separate probes into the company, whic...
>>>
>>> 🔗
>>> https://news.slashdot.org/story/24/12/18/1249207/us-weighs-banning-tp-link-router-over-national-security-concerns
>>> <https://news.slashdot.org/story/24/12/18/1249207/us-weighs-banning-tp-link-router-over-national-security-concerns>
>>>
>>> www.msn.com
>>>
>>> MSN <#>
>>>
>>> 🔗
>>> https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/u-s-weighs-ban-on-chinese-made-router-in-millions-of-american-homes/ar-AA1w51es
>>> <https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/u-s-weighs-ban-on-chinese-made-router-in-millions-of-american-homes/ar-AA1w51es>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify
>>> System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest
>>> davecb@spamcop.net | -- Mark Twain
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Bloat mailing list
>>> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
>>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
--
David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify
System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest
davecb@spamcop.net | -- Mark Twain
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-18 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <a4c3d527-2d39-4f34-8a75-fe40e9e843db.ref@rogers.com>
2024-12-18 14:54 ` David Collier-Brown
2024-12-18 15:04 ` David Collier-Brown
2024-12-18 15:27 ` David Lang
2024-12-18 15:43 ` David Collier-Brown [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bc717f59-f1a2-4d43-a7d7-2cd3dc438c33@rogers.com \
--to=davec-b@rogers.com \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox