From: "Dave Täht" <dave@taht.net>
To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bloat] TCP BBR paper is now generally available
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 05:22:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d0093907-6301-6046-17d1-602dbbed6afe@taht.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1612080923010.1747@uplift.swm.pp.se>
drop tail works better than any single queue aqm in this scenario.
On 12/8/16 12:24 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Dec 2016, Dave Taht wrote:
>
>> http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=3022184
>
> "BBR converges toward a fair share of the bottleneck bandwidth whether
> competing with other BBR flows or with loss-based congestion control."
>
> That's not what I took away from your tests of having BBR and Cubic
> flows together, where BBR just killed Cubic dead.
>
> What has changed since? Have you re-done your tests with whatever has
> changed, I must have missed that? Or did I misunderstand?
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-08 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-02 15:52 Dave Taht
2016-12-02 19:15 ` Aaron Wood
2016-12-02 20:32 ` Jonathan Morton
2016-12-02 22:22 ` Neal Cardwell
2016-12-02 22:40 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-12-02 23:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-03 13:03 ` Neal Cardwell
2016-12-03 19:13 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-12-03 20:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-03 20:26 ` Jonathan Morton
2016-12-03 21:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-03 21:34 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-12-03 21:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-03 22:13 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-12-03 22:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-03 23:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-03 23:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-03 23:03 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-12-03 23:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-03 23:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-04 3:18 ` Neal Cardwell
2016-12-04 8:44 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-12-04 17:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-04 17:38 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-12-06 17:20 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-12-06 21:31 ` Neal Cardwell
2016-12-03 21:38 ` Jonathan Morton
2016-12-03 21:33 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-12-07 16:28 ` Alan Jenkins
2016-12-07 16:47 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-12-07 17:03 ` Alan Jenkins
2016-12-08 8:24 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2016-12-08 13:22 ` Dave Täht [this message]
2016-12-08 14:01 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2016-12-08 21:29 ` Neal Cardwell
2016-12-08 22:31 ` Yuchung Cheng
2016-12-09 14:52 ` Klatsky, Carl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d0093907-6301-6046-17d1-602dbbed6afe@taht.net \
--to=dave@taht.net \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox