From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.taht.net (mail.taht.net [176.58.107.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6BD23B25E for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 15:43:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dair-2506.local (c-73-231-152-246.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.152.246]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.taht.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6F7FC21320 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 19:43:34 +0000 (UTC) To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <20160916211120.GA38308@sesse.net> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Dave_T=c3=a4ht?= Message-ID: Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 12:43:33 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Bloat] "BBR" TCP patches submitted to linux kernel X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 19:43:35 -0000 On 9/29/16 4:24 AM, Mário Sérgio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote: > Is there a mailing list I can lurk in to follow on the development? > > I'm most interested on a delta to apply to Android 6.x Franco Kernel > (https://github.com/franciscofranco/angler) Android is still shipping linux 3.10? How... quaint. > and Debian Jessie. I have built .debs for ubuntu and am going to go build debs for jessie on arm soon. > FreeBSD support would be excellent but I don't even have reviewed the > license to be sure if we need a clean room development (hence I haven't > read the code) The bbr code is licensed dual bsd/gpl. It's dependent on a bunch of apis though... or we can try to relocate it directly. On a side FreeBSD > note, I'm hopeful for > > 1. Packet pacing (https://wiki.freebsd.org/DevSummit/201606/Transport) was good to read up on the progress there, although I think 1ms timing in bsd is needing to be upgraded. > 2. ipfw/dummynet AQM with FQ-Codel > (https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw/2016-February/006026.html) I made some comments on this that I'd like people to look at what is really going on in bsd + fq_codel at > 100mbit. https://github.com/opnsense/core/issues/505 > Most excellent news. > > On 16/09/2016 19:29, Dave Taht wrote: >> Thank you for this, in particular... >> >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg395552.html >> >> still reading over the code... >> >> TCP Pr0n, this is! >> _______________________________________________ >> Bloat mailing list >> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat > > > > _______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat >