From: Matthias Tafelmeier <matthias.tafelmeier@gmx.net>
To: Ken Birman <kpb3@cornell.edu>, 'Dave Taht' <dave@taht.net>
Cc: Bob Briscoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>,
"ken@cs.cornell.edu" <ken@cs.cornell.edu>,
"bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net" <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] DETNET
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 21:09:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ecfe6b39-79b3-fa8e-8ec3-43f650efabc2@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN6PR04MB1187882B94D20E6A668CA3E19F290@BN6PR04MB1187.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 939 bytes --]
On 11/15/2017 08:45 PM, Ken Birman wrote:
> I'm missing context. Can someone tell me why I'm being cc'ed on these?
right, I cced you so I'm liable to clarify.
> Topic seems germane to me (Derecho uses RDMA on RoCE) but I'm unclear what this thread is "about"
I perceived you as a strong kind of advocate for RDMA, at least that's a
supposition I hold ever since having read your blogs/research around it.
It was mentioned here in context with other existing or already
pertaining technologies as to the purpose of improving network
performance in general - especially for certain domains. Therefore, I
thought blending/exchanging knowledge or inciting a discussion might be
profitable for both worlds.
Originally, this ML is for the Bufferbloat project, but, occassionally
it does get captivated ...
>> Feel free to tinker your bayes filter if all sounds too alien.<<
--
Besten Gruß
Matthias Tafelmeier
[-- Attachment #1.1.2: 0x8ADF343B.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 4806 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 538 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-15 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-04 13:45 Matthias Tafelmeier
[not found] ` <87shdr0vt6.fsf@nemesis.taht.net>
2017-11-12 14:58 ` Matthias Tafelmeier
2017-11-12 19:58 ` Bob Briscoe
2017-11-13 17:56 ` Matthias Tafelmeier
2017-11-15 19:31 ` Dave Taht
2017-11-15 19:45 ` Ken Birman
2017-11-15 20:09 ` Matthias Tafelmeier [this message]
2017-11-15 20:16 ` Dave Taht
2017-11-15 21:01 ` Ken Birman
2017-11-18 15:56 ` Matthias Tafelmeier
2017-12-11 20:32 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2017-12-11 20:43 ` Ken Birman
2017-11-18 15:38 ` Matthias Tafelmeier
2017-11-18 15:45 ` Ken Birman
2017-11-19 18:33 ` Dave Taht
2017-11-19 20:24 ` Ken Birman
2017-11-20 17:56 ` [Bloat] *** GMX Spamverdacht *** DETNET Matthias Tafelmeier
2017-11-20 19:04 ` Ken Birman
2017-12-17 12:46 ` Matthias Tafelmeier
2017-12-17 16:06 ` Ken Birman
2017-11-18 17:55 ` [Bloat] DETNET Matthias Tafelmeier
2017-11-18 19:43 ` Ken Birman
2017-11-18 19:47 ` Ken Birman
2017-11-20 18:32 ` Matthias Tafelmeier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ecfe6b39-79b3-fa8e-8ec3-43f650efabc2@gmx.net \
--to=matthias.tafelmeier@gmx.net \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave@taht.net \
--cc=ietf@bobbriscoe.net \
--cc=ken@cs.cornell.edu \
--cc=kpb3@cornell.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox