From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-x22b.google.com (mail-wm0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D34773BA8E for ; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 11:34:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wm0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id t189so35655223wmt.1 for ; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 08:34:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:cc:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hP3Ybm6nCE0yHRFG2ul6gkrYS14q0+PHJbfHsEtgaeM=; b=hCGeZY3v7jgGbh3s++bXdOopNFHVcDnB9AicTItVWnz7kLcZ71T0AcUqJZVUBUZQli icthkVSWa8aGqrium5U5BDlMOvjD1+NWosodnKxi7I/i6FzlXACFj39oER5PpFqYSYfj u5qLKyU8pXe/sbIImmcb+tbOWSlh6O9PIiwq+w1qsxXq/eviCS5lLIovJhTceDjSAgLZ Y0TrseQgu8dhYhUrAQIiwO2rRfodFcyOP43CDKOIKmHuTbimfl/hVEGQofPk5kSV6Xxi svlk4fZFt0cs6XM2fLPFV3GVdDZI1IuG8Z4eQmT5Tymkufqj5SRsXrUvBUUJvY2t5EzG o/sw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:cc:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hP3Ybm6nCE0yHRFG2ul6gkrYS14q0+PHJbfHsEtgaeM=; b=kYdENv3xK3dRGfq8Da15nE/2Vqz6qc74b3D8jyl7v8uLgKq3rYJx5TrPPpW8L9bSbq cdeM5b22mn7He8GwIk0DjweBRSK77Ee0e54HFtapMOAZ+7hUkeAN9GfXtIN7j/OYE4TU eJfjvcHvCjFNLFjCNiba/yKHOjojXOx2rl4BK1NlknW/1KqS0Q+O7lOyGp27F+HxUK+6 EB30Bbc3zKy2Mz6PE/rycyINop76fgqpVIm4Z2GLMAZZs0oLZK+Zbqw7OrILFCTUh78T 7R93yQwBFSiHmuJEzzFy7UgDhuk9eOTg2zv8l0OLKfC8HkKzkxIeQDPtv8vWn7981MRe GR7A== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3tXbS/BmHjIDCVhTMFEu7ujq04jCuBfZnV+oCmtWx/sfyi2KDzHn36nuNP6ChH8g== X-Received: by 10.28.0.78 with SMTP id 75mr2894219wma.138.1489851262889; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 08:34:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.116] (cm149-53.liwest.at. [81.10.149.53]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o15sm13862266wra.61.2017.03.18.08.34.21 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 18 Mar 2017 08:34:22 -0700 (PDT) From: xnor To: "bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net" Cc: chromatix99@gmail.com Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 15:34:22 +0000 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <1489785303.28631.318.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> References: <1489785303.28631.318.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> Reply-To: xnor User-Agent: eM_Client/7.0.27943.0 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Bloat] Inaccurate rates with HTB/HFSC+fq_codel on router due to VLAN? X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 15:34:24 -0000 Hey Jonathan, I have updated to Lede 17.01.0, installed sch_cake, replaced my=20 htb/hfsc+fq_codels with cakes (with bandwidth, docsis, internet=20 options), but the problem persists. I've seen that it has an autorate_ingress option, which doesn't improve=20 my situation. But it raises a question: Why not operate on ingress rates, or at least add an ingress-operation=20 option/mode? If I understood it correctly, and very simplified speaking, right now a=20 queue is filled with link speed and drained by a configured bandwidth.=20 As the pressure in a queue rises, packets will be dropped/marked to=20 reduce pressure to some tolerable level. Why not measure ingress rate (averaged over a window related to the=20 configured rtt) and increase pressure if the ingress rate surpasses the=20 configured bandwidth? Anyway, I can provide information of cake now. Just let me know what you= =20 need (tc -d -s qdisc/class/filter ... I guess).