From: Dave Collier-Brown <dave.collier-brown@indexexchange.com>
To: Erik Auerswald <auerswal@unix-ag.uni-kl.de>
Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Sidebar re illustrating quality (was: New Version Notification for draft-cpaasch-ippm-responsiveness-00.txt)
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2021 12:31:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f1f0edb4-556e-39c4-39b0-9c4333ff77c4@indexexchange.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210821102300.GA3708@unix-ag.uni-kl.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2287 bytes --]
I like the idea, especially if you did it it as an actual "card", like a school report card
On 2021-08-21 6:23 a.m., Erik Auerswald wrote:
Perhaps the idea of a "score" (e.g., A through F) assigned to each
individual metric that is then combined to produce an "overall score" is
not that bad? It is not perfect, it hides details, and it cannot please
everyone, but might be useful.
(I personally always want to see the base values and the method to
comupte both the individual and the overall score, so I can assess the
applicability of the score to my requirements.)
How about:
Report Card for Little Johnny Rogers (rogers.com)
Latency: F (200ms, where 42 expected for a round-trip to San Francisco)
Throughput, Up: B (16.87 Mb/S where 20 advertised)
Throughput, Down: A (182.1 Mb/S where 175 advertised)
RPM: D- (23 where 65 expected)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Overall: F (Lowest of the above marks)
--dave
--
David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify
System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest
dave.collier-brown@indexexchange.com<mailto:dave.collier-brown@indexexchange.com> | -- Mark Twain
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER : This telecommunication, including any and all attachments, contains confidential information intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any dissemination, distribution, copying or disclosure is strictly prohibited and is not a waiver of confidentiality. If you have received this telecommunication in error, please notify the sender immediately by return electronic mail and delete the message from your inbox and deleted items folders. This telecommunication does not constitute an express or implied agreement to conduct transactions by electronic means, nor does it constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment or an acceptance of a contract offer. Contract terms contained in this telecommunication are subject to legal review and the completion of formal documentation and are not binding until same is confirmed in writing and has been signed by an authorized signatory.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3720 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-21 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-13 21:41 [Bloat] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-cpaasch-ippm-responsiveness-00.txt Christoph Paasch
2021-08-15 13:39 ` Erik Auerswald
2021-08-18 22:01 ` Christoph Paasch
2021-08-19 7:17 ` Erik Auerswald
2021-08-19 15:48 ` Christoph Paasch
2021-08-19 17:50 ` [Bloat] Sidebar re illustrating quality (was: New Version Notification for draft-cpaasch-ippm-responsiveness-00.txt) Dave Collier-Brown
2021-08-19 21:17 ` Kenneth Porter
2021-08-20 1:58 ` Dave Collier-Brown
2021-08-21 1:22 ` Kenneth Porter
2021-08-21 11:01 ` Sebastian Moeller
2021-08-21 10:23 ` Erik Auerswald
2021-08-21 16:31 ` Dave Collier-Brown [this message]
2021-09-21 20:50 ` [Bloat] [ippm] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-cpaasch-ippm-responsiveness-00.txt Toerless Eckert
2021-10-22 23:19 ` Christoph Paasch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f1f0edb4-556e-39c4-39b0-9c4333ff77c4@indexexchange.com \
--to=dave.collier-brown@indexexchange.com \
--cc=auerswal@unix-ag.uni-kl.de \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox