From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 549FE3B29D for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 20:08:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 609D210C2; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 20:08:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from imap38 ([10.202.2.88]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 23 Jan 2021 20:08:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lochnair.net; h= mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm2; bh=aM8dMzTfzppsYK0iz9ryJSRXEzSZn0i LXcUFFSmNdV4=; b=nwHtCAiFsslPqqnkkMcfXpNU72y+LQga6T0Ab8VH4Sj9ajk geRhY1Z7TWLcKvvc8mJ722yxQpf5ckHplfLN07rIwmp4Y+bdMjExjzIxe+6eSaAB OfAkTJYQ37+e2lkiogEkyW+2SafEuEEPYsa0l4RJiUs2oz9ciHCKHni3xjMUH8VC 98eeFFmPc29Sn1pk3FfJVUYTcy+LdxCxBhdrHiU3X5N5PfudCBUZq4gJDCoKR1SP SzAe9eetHP+zCTz+NXIX+vvdhe4ET/T/my99ekDv6v42KEtHtNoBzt0g/a/GBl1y kMIpn0DHZXcKfzdHE/NZZTWUAP8FeOlDqCJUFYw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=aM8dMz TfzppsYK0iz9ryJSRXEzSZn0iLXcUFFSmNdV4=; b=QMtbXomrl3TTDcKrbmiyCt YfUtkeBjT/nQKtOhvI6RJT/GjDYSKZvUb9D1/Nr1TMnft4u+HZnc5+cJBkvPhw+9 8mrq3C8/PDITzEfKW6CTn2AYsRQeupNZbjpxT6H8fRMgrUZQszJl//1kXpRjHnSm Nsiqo4flmuLqLBo3R1Q395rh6SRTiZqm8EgXyjfcZpkPDRVp2xaMDVt78KA3DGdx 872RlS6FNzTPfFgMxH/i0/aeaPC+gNAFXZAnBKkjuJsvB6IqJRMLfqhN355HXOsh Pcj3Z+o+q6UDNYI9+j5vDVI2fbeenKc7qxI2S1YUErxs2jtdFRbSvHRCUkXZoX0A == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudelgddvlecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttdertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfpfhilhhs ucetnhgurhgvrghsucfuvhgvvgdfuceomhgvsehlohgthhhnrghirhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgfdtudejgeekhfdvffehudehfeduhfeuieehhfekhfeltdeiudff udfffeeitedtnecuffhomhgrihhnpehuihdrtghomhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpe dtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmvgeslhhotghhnhgrihhrrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id A5461CA005D; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 20:08:49 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-78-g36b56e88ef-fm-20210120.001-g36b56e88 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2021 02:08:29 +0100 From: "Nils Andreas Svee" To: "Dave Taht" , bloat Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Bloat] UniFi Dream Machine Pro X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2021 01:08:51 -0000 > For the record I helped do the original fq_codel port to the > edgerouter over a weekend back in 2013. the ubnt > community jumped all over it, polished up the configuration language > to use it, leveraged the sqm > spec and demanded the result in their next formal release... which > ubnt did. It's been an ever > increasing "selling feature" for them ever since. > > There were like 800 messages on that wonderful 2013 thread, can't find it now. > > I don't know how closed this hw is, compared to the older edgerouters. > I can go hit the ubnt > forums to find out. Back then the devkit was freely available. > > I wouldn't mind getting in there to finally fix frame compensation or > integrate cake. Shame they haven't been as interested in implementing CAKE in their firmware. We haven't reached fq_codel levels of activity for CAKE, but we've still got well over 500 replies to that thread. Personally after getting CAKE to work on those boxes, I have never looked back. It's just that good. Last time I saw someone ask about getting CAKE implemented in the stock FW, UBNT-staff just sent them my way [1]. [1]: https://community.ui.com/questions/Cake-SQM-AQM/8da70eda-de9c-46e1-b439-056f1d035350#answer/92c0a3b6-23b8-4140-92f1-4410d5daeb34 Best Regards Nils