From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gnrb-bloat@m.gmane.org>
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48F9421F1EE
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 01:05:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <gnrb-bloat@m.gmane.org>) id 1VQBzz-0002UR-I5
	for bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 10:05:03 +0200
Received: from c-50-132-41-203.hsd1.wa.comcast.net ([50.132.41.203])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 10:05:03 +0200
Received: from eternaleye by c-50-132-41-203.hsd1.wa.comcast.net with local
	(Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 10:05:03 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
From: Alex Elsayed <eternaleye@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 01:02:50 -0700
Message-ID: <l28mr1$bcu$2@ger.gmane.org>
References: <CAA93jw6JVMWqjwAU+uKWjjT4rW1jTZPBLF71PztVR-GEMvvrOw@mail.gmail.com>
	<2719938E-E24A-4A06-898F-CE90CBED005C@inria.fr>
	<1380122152.3165.156.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<5243036F.90302@orange.com>
	<1380128313.3165.157.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<CAA93jw7h99EgTiSON-RUW7mpHWgOA2SLF0TwFE6o3-j0BU4sug@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-50-132-41-203.hsd1.wa.comcast.net
User-Agent: KNode/4.11.1
Cc: aqm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Bloat] [aqm] TSO sizing fixes and the new paced "fq" scheduler
	in Linux 3.12
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 08:05:09 -0000

Dave Taht wrote:

> On Sep 25, 2013 9:58 AM, "Eric Dumazet"
> <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 17:38 +0200, Luca MUSCARIELLO wrote:
>>
>> > Then, I feel like FQ is a bad name to call this "newFQ".
>> > It's an implementation of a fair TCP pacer. Which is very useful, but
>> > FQ is kind of misleading, IMHO.
>>
>> No problem, feel free to send a patch. I am very bad at choosing names.
> 
> Fair TCP pacer = ftp # taken
> Paced fair queue = pfq # lit collision
> Enhanced paced queue = epq # pronounced epic!

There's also the option of 'Fair Queue Pacing', but I don't think we'd like 
how 'fqp' would be pronounced :P