From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.protonmail.ch (mail1.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BA383B2A4 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 10:08:42 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2021 15:08:29 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail; t=1612796920; bh=06k/6e1lBsT39H2QpAyZRlyYcAUI6wA5AvM10cNtgM4=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=RvzlJJGCrWs0Du3qYf/Dz2i9bIPkLm1BSK7k4fBkL13bNQhKWWVaeSHLgVU4eQbaB ZAE2g9o2eVN/f1k1B+gysRTLyrera+PANrOhqlLunEIeQrZToJ/m554LtNH2pUhG3q xjrLyQ1JQepH4PVsxlqw+F70AX5WFGIj/hXmFLZ4= To: Rich Brown From: Michael Yartys Cc: bloat Reply-To: Michael Yartys Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <50F8B7C1-8247-455A-B22B-59A73FAF7147@gmail.com> References: <50F8B7C1-8247-455A-B22B-59A73FAF7147@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mailout.protonmail.ch Subject: Re: [Bloat] Robert X. Cringley: Wi-Fi 6 & Bufferbloat X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2021 15:08:42 -0000 This is from the article: "Google Wi-Fi, and especially Nest, are terrible.= " I thought Google was one of the companies that really cared about this issu= e in their router products, at least the mesh stuff. Michael =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Original Me= ssage =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 On Monday, February 8th, 2021 at 14:43, Rich Brown wrote: > Once again, Cringely waves the bufferbloat flag... > > https://betanews.com/2021/02/05/wi-fi-6-is-a-bust-bufferbloat/ > > Bloat mailing list > > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat