From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EF9221F1D7 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 13:57:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WescD-0002dt-U3 for bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 22:57:29 +0200 Received: from 32.97.110.57 ([32.97.110.57]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 22:57:29 +0200 Received: from wmf by 32.97.110.57 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 22:57:29 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net From: Wes Felter Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:57:15 -0500 Message-ID: References: <535D4F22.6060602@cobb.uk.net> <535D5548.1000208@rogers.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 32.97.110.57 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 In-Reply-To: <535D5548.1000208@rogers.com> Cc: aqm@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Bloat] Slightly off-topic: [Internet Policy] FCC's latest action - two questions X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 20:57:33 -0000 I would expect ISPs to disable (or never enable) AQM on the "slow lane" to maximize the difference between the two services. After all, people won't pay for the fast lane if it's the same speed as the slow lane. -- Wes Felter