Re: [Bloat] bufferbloat at high edge rates

[David Lang <david@lang.hm>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2784 bytes --]

my run was on 16.10 and I extended both upload and download to 45 sec.

David Lang

On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, jb wrote:

> Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 11:16:27 +1100
> From: jb <justin@dslr.net>
> To: Colin Dearborn <Colin.Dearborn@sjrb.ca>
> Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
> Subject: Re: [Bloat] bufferbloat at high edge rates
> 
> Apparently there is not enough duration currently: there is actual buffer
> bloat data in your results, but it is insufficient in quantity so the site
> isn't bothering to show and interpret it. Can you try one run by extending
> the duration of download and upload phases?
>
> if that doesn't work I'll have to patch the binary to make sure there is
> always enough, and upload a new one..
>
> thanks
>
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Colin Dearborn <Colin.Dearborn@sjrb.ca>
> wrote:
>
>> I just ran it on ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS, as root, and it did not store the
>> bufferbloat, quality or speed grades.
>>
>> https://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6186501
>>
>> https://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6186425
>>
>>
>>
>> I do note that it ran these tests over my HE.net tunnel and there doesn’t
>> seem to be an easy way to choose IPv6 vs IPv4 on the command line.
>>
>> Disabling the IPv6 tunnel, I still don’t see the grades:
>>
>> https://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6187015
>>
>>
>>
>> ./dslrcli-linux-amd64 --version
>>
>> Dslrcli version 0.1 - 17-Nov-2016
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Bloat [mailto:bloat-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net] *On Behalf Of *
>> jb
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 15, 2016 9:09 PM
>> *To:* David Lang <david@lang.hm>
>> *Cc:* bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
>> *Subject:* Re: [Bloat] bufferbloat at high edge rates
>>
>>
>>
>> It has to run as root / Admin in order to do ICMP in order to test buffer
>> bloat.
>>
>>
>>
>> If you run it under a non privileged user account it cannot get permission
>> for ICMP, so although it locates the nearest servers using http ping, it
>> isn't doing any buffer bloat testing.
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm not sure that is the issue but that's the first thing that comes to
>> mind..
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:34 AM, David Lang <david@lang.hm> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 15 Nov 2016, jb wrote:
>>
>> The command line tool is available to anyone now (Windows, OSX and linux),
>> it does buffer bloat probing, using ICMP if run as root, and is immune to
>> any browser issues. It can be downloaded here from the sticky:
>>   http://www.dslreports.com/forum/speedtestbinary
>>
>>
>> This does not seem to be reporting any bloat info (I've run it a couple
>> times)
>>
>> http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6156013
>>
>> David Lang
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bloat mailing list
>> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>>
>>
>>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 140 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat