From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.lang.hm (unknown [66.167.227.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD4743B29D for ; Sun, 3 May 2020 20:26:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dlang-laptop.LAN (dlang-laptop.LAN [10.2.0.162]) by mail.lang.hm (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA0C7B3DBB; Sun, 3 May 2020 17:26:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 3 May 2020 17:26:14 -0700 (PDT) From: David Lang X-X-Sender: dlang@dlang-laptop To: Dave Taht cc: Daniel Sterling , Rich Brown , bloat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <3764C024-5F18-41C8-98F0-9FA423ED5860@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.1 (DEB 209 2017-03-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8323328-1172522068-1588551974=:16262" Subject: Re: [Bloat] Multiple WAN ports & SQM? X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 00:26:16 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323328-1172522068-1588551974=:16262 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT I've been wanting to set this sort of thing up (the best DSL I can get is 8/1, and that's with a bondd DSL setup) but have not been able to find a good tutorial in setting things up. anyone have any pointers? David Lang On Sun, 3 May 2020, Dave Taht wrote: > Date: Sun, 3 May 2020 07:33:56 -0700 > From: Dave Taht > To: Daniel Sterling > Cc: Rich Brown , bloat > Subject: Re: [Bloat] Multiple WAN ports & SQM? > > not huge on bonding, simpler to just get the two uplinks and split > flows across them with an sqm instance for each and a tc hash > directing flows at one or another. > > On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 7:30 AM Daniel Sterling > wrote: >> >> When I had both DSL and cable modem, I compiled Linux with this patch set to make multi gateway NAT work and it worked great >> >> http://ja.ssi.bg/#routes >> >> Should be able to use that plus ifb+cake on each NIC to do the right thing, aye? >> >> As an aside, I'm kind of furious that NAT fix never got merged upstream :( it's so useful for multiple uplinks >> >> -- Dan >> >> On May 3, 2020, at 10:23 AM, Rich Brown wrote: >> >> Given the crummy internet service in my area (DSL, max of 15mbps/1mbps), I wonder if we could improve things by getting a second connection from our ISP and "bonding" the two links together in my OpenWrt router. >> >> I see both Multiwan (which is self-described as old) and mwan3. >> >> But neither would seem to offer the kinds of latency control (SQM/fq_codel/cake) that the cool kids in networking have come to expect. >> >> Any recommendations from this group for such an effort? Thanks. >> >> Rich >> _______________________________________________ >> Bloat mailing list >> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bloat mailing list >> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat > > > > -- > Make Music, Not War > > Dave Täht > CTO, TekLibre, LLC > http://www.teklibre.com > Tel: 1-831-435-0729 > _______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat --8323328-1172522068-1588551974=:16262--