From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
Cc: "David P. Reed" <dpreed@deepplum.com>,
Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>,
bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] FW: [Dewayne-Net] Ajit Pai caves to SpaceX but is still skeptical of Musk's latency claims
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 17:06:36 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2006131704020.16262@qynat-yncgbc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7056.1592082916@localhost>
> Right, if you overprovision the network, and under-utilize it with CBR links,
> then clearly you can get quality, at a high cost.
> I don't think you can make a lot of money at this, because ultimately
> terrestrial providers came in and ate that lunch.
only in urban areas, there are still large parts of the US (let alone the rest
of the world) where cell coverage is spotty and Internet options are few and
slow. running wire/fiber is expensive and doesn't make sense if the customer
density is too low.
wireless ISPs are partially filling that gap, but only partially
David Lang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-14 0:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-11 16:03 David P. Reed
2020-06-11 16:14 ` Jonathan Morton
2020-06-11 18:46 ` David P. Reed
2020-06-11 18:56 ` David Lang
2020-06-11 19:16 ` David P. Reed
2020-06-11 19:28 ` David Lang
2020-06-12 15:39 ` Michael Richardson
2020-06-13 5:43 ` David Lang
2020-06-13 18:41 ` David P. Reed
2020-06-14 0:03 ` David Lang
2020-06-14 0:36 ` Michael Richardson
2020-06-14 1:17 ` David Lang
2020-06-14 15:40 ` David P. Reed
2020-06-14 15:57 ` Michael Richardson
2020-06-14 21:04 ` David P. Reed
2020-06-14 23:13 ` Michael Richardson
2020-06-12 15:30 ` Michael Richardson
2020-06-12 19:50 ` David P. Reed
2020-06-13 21:15 ` Michael Richardson
2020-06-13 23:02 ` Jonathan Morton
2020-06-14 0:06 ` David Lang [this message]
2020-06-14 11:23 ` Roland Bless
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2006131704020.16262@qynat-yncgbc \
--to=david@lang.hm \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=dpreed@deepplum.com \
--cc=mcr@sandelman.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox