From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] starlink testing
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 11:00:45 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2104191057361.18176@qynat-yncgbc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5FEe90Dw3_tGubna=_Urzbq6dYMMrifGV7bMuhL2nXKg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1638 bytes --]
are you able to sniff between the router and the dish? I'm curious how much of
the smarts is in the dish vs the router. My hope is that the router is just a
conventional router with the satellite network smarts in the dish.
David Lang
On Mon, 19 Apr 2021, Dave Taht wrote:
> Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 06:56:33 -0700
> From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
> To: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
> Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
> Subject: [Bloat] starlink testing
>
> I find myself in front of a starlink terminal this morning, and have
> been doing various tests. The behavior of their network is like
> nothing I've ever seen before, appearing to re-adjust the available
> bandwidth on a 10sec interval, and... yes... they have bufferbloat...
> bad.
>
> Still running quite the large battery of tests at the moment. They are
> behind a large cgnat, and
> no ipv6 is available, either. I can make available some tests and
> packet caps if anyone wants a look.
>
> If anyone would like to drop in on me and help talk me
> down^H^H^H^H^H^H^H strategize on how
> best to tell 'em about things like fq_codel and cake, I can be found
> over here (any login you want, no password) from 7AM PDT through 9AM.
>
> https://tun.taht.net:8443/group/bufferbloat
>
>
>
> --
> "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public
> relations, for Mother Nature cannot be fooled" - Richard Feynman
>
> dave@taht.net <Dave Täht> CTO, TekLibre, LLC Tel: 1-831-435-0729
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-19 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-19 13:56 Dave Taht
2021-04-19 18:00 ` David Lang [this message]
2021-04-19 21:10 ` Michael Richardson
2021-04-19 21:42 ` David Lang
2021-04-20 14:09 ` Michael Richardson
2021-04-20 15:48 ` Dave Taht
2021-04-20 16:03 ` Michael Richardson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2104191057361.18176@qynat-yncgbc \
--to=david@lang.hm \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox