From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.lang.hm (unknown [66.167.227.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C48783B29E for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2023 12:20:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dlang-mobile (unknown [10.2.2.237]) by mail.lang.hm (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1D9B1944DA; Mon, 5 Jun 2023 09:20:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 09:20:28 -0700 (PDT) From: David Lang To: "Luis A. Cornejo" cc: David Lang , John D , bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <58238rpr-80q1-3p5s-849q-604ns5659s7r@ynat.uz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="228850167-332619972-1685982028=:15245" Subject: Re: [Bloat] Dual WAN home router with decent SQM? X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2023 16:20:29 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --228850167-332619972-1685982028=:15245 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT you aren't going to bond two differnt ISPs for faster upload. you may setup tunnels over each of the ISPs and bond them together. Even with a full BGP link, any given connection is very unlikely to use both ISPs. David Lang On Mon, 5 Jun 2023, Luis A. Cornejo wrote: > Iąve done the multi wan with mwan3 and it works fine for load balance or > failover. > > But if you are trying to improve your upload then the best you can get is > one upload vs the other. You wonąt get both uploads to the same stream, > that is bonding, which is a little harder to do. > > -Luis > > On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 9:35 AM David Lang via Bloat < > bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote: > >> any router that you can run OpenWRT on will do the job >> look at the mwan3 package to mange the multiple ISPs >> >> at 100Mb, you don't need an especially beefy router. >> >> David Lang >> >> On Sun, 4 Jun 2023, John D >> via Bloat wrote: >> >>> Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2023 09:48:21 +0100 >>> From: John D via Bloat >>> Reply-To: John D >>> To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net >>> Subject: [Bloat] Dual WAN home router with decent SQM? >>> >>> I want to set up a new home router with SQM support to alleviate (mostly >>> upload) bloat. >>> However I would also like dual ISP support, more for backup/failover than >>> load sharing. >>> I can see affordable multi wan "load balancer" routers eg TP-link, and >>> affordable SQM routers such as ubiquity Edgerouter, but I'm struggling to >>> find a single device providing both. >>> Just after any advice on a) am I better having two separate components b) >>> if so any suggestions which product/brand? >>> Two devices means more configuration but possibly more flexible and >> cheaper. >>> >>> My internet speed is looking to max out around 100/20mbps so I don't need >>> Gbit performance. Thanks for any help. >>> _______________________________________________ >> Bloat mailing list >> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat >> _______________________________________________ >> Bloat mailing list >> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat >> > --228850167-332619972-1685982028=:15245--