Cake - FQ_codel the next generation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pete Heist <peteheist@gmail.com>
To: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
Cc: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>, cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] diffserv3 tin 2 target 50% of interval?
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 16:41:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <03382281-3A3D-4291-A3D1-8DC57E7139D5@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874lzmfol6.fsf@alrua-kau>


> On Feb 22, 2017, at 12:32 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> wrote:
> 
> Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>>> On 22 Feb, 2017, at 13:12, Pete Heist <peteheist@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Ok, but for what it’s worth, so far I’m not seeing this confer any benefit as
>>> far as latency is concerned. I will make full results available later, but for
>>> now, here are two plots for the rrul test
>> 
>> The RRUL test, when viewed in Flent, only shows the latency induced by one flow
>> (bulk) on another (ping). This is influenced mainly by the flow-isolation and
>> priority-queue mechanisms, not by AQM.
> 
> Flent in git will capture the TCP RTT (using ss) and plot that as well;
> you can try that out and see if you can measure a difference :)

Hi Toke, thanks for that, I’m finally getting around to using flent from source now, and saw the new plots: tcp_cwnd, tcp_rtt and tcp_rtt_cdf- then figured out they only work when the test is run with the —socket-stats flag. :)

They shouldn’t otherwise affect the results, right? Because I’d basically enable this for all of my flent runs.

Preliminarily, I _am_ seeing differences within TCP flows as the configuration is changed on my OM2P-HS / LEDE setup. There are some surprises, at least for me, but I’ll save the details until I post my second round of results because they require a lot of context, but hopefully these stats help give more insight into what’s going on. Thanks!

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-19 15:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-22 10:17 Pete Heist
2017-02-22 10:24 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-02-22 11:12   ` Pete Heist
2017-02-22 11:24     ` Jonathan Morton
2017-02-22 11:32       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2017-03-19 15:41         ` Pete Heist [this message]
2017-02-22 12:44       ` Pete Heist

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=03382281-3A3D-4291-A3D1-8DC57E7139D5@gmail.com \
    --to=peteheist@gmail.com \
    --cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=chromatix99@gmail.com \
    --cc=toke@toke.dk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox