From: Pete Heist <peteheist@gmail.com>
To: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
Cc: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>, cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] diffserv3 tin 2 target 50% of interval?
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 16:41:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <03382281-3A3D-4291-A3D1-8DC57E7139D5@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874lzmfol6.fsf@alrua-kau>
> On Feb 22, 2017, at 12:32 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> wrote:
>
> Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>> On 22 Feb, 2017, at 13:12, Pete Heist <peteheist@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Ok, but for what it’s worth, so far I’m not seeing this confer any benefit as
>>> far as latency is concerned. I will make full results available later, but for
>>> now, here are two plots for the rrul test
>>
>> The RRUL test, when viewed in Flent, only shows the latency induced by one flow
>> (bulk) on another (ping). This is influenced mainly by the flow-isolation and
>> priority-queue mechanisms, not by AQM.
>
> Flent in git will capture the TCP RTT (using ss) and plot that as well;
> you can try that out and see if you can measure a difference :)
Hi Toke, thanks for that, I’m finally getting around to using flent from source now, and saw the new plots: tcp_cwnd, tcp_rtt and tcp_rtt_cdf- then figured out they only work when the test is run with the —socket-stats flag. :)
They shouldn’t otherwise affect the results, right? Because I’d basically enable this for all of my flent runs.
Preliminarily, I _am_ seeing differences within TCP flows as the configuration is changed on my OM2P-HS / LEDE setup. There are some surprises, at least for me, but I’ll save the details until I post my second round of results because they require a lot of context, but hopefully these stats help give more insight into what’s going on. Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-19 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-22 10:17 Pete Heist
2017-02-22 10:24 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-02-22 11:12 ` Pete Heist
2017-02-22 11:24 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-02-22 11:32 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2017-03-19 15:41 ` Pete Heist [this message]
2017-02-22 12:44 ` Pete Heist
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=03382281-3A3D-4291-A3D1-8DC57E7139D5@gmail.com \
--to=peteheist@gmail.com \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=toke@toke.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox