From: Pete Heist <peteheist@gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave@taht.net>
Cc: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>, Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cake] [RFC PATCH 4/5] q_netem: support delivering packets in delayed time slots
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:02:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <037FE91B-5F27-4CAD-AB56-24ED829C08F0@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8760a6rog8.fsf@nemesis.taht.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 647 bytes --]
> On Nov 19, 2017, at 9:41 PM, Dave Taht <dave@taht.net> wrote:
>
>> Yep with bql. I hadn’t thought about mq before. What my qos setup scripts are
>> doing though is replacing the root qdisc (which now I see defaults to mq) with a
>> single cake instance. With bql, should rather be leaving mq and putting four
>> cake instances underneath it?
> Only if you want unlimited mode, and birthday problems, and don't have
> cpu to burn.
Ok, if I compare the two, latency under load for rrul_be looks “better” (~1-1.5ms instead of ~3ms) with a single “cake unlimited besteffort lan” instance instead of four of them underneath mq.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2291 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-20 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.1042.1510953593.3609.cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2017-11-18 13:18 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-18 19:02 ` Dave Taht
2017-11-19 18:48 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-19 20:41 ` Dave Taht
2017-11-20 9:02 ` Pete Heist [this message]
2017-11-21 18:52 ` Dave Taht
2017-11-20 2:56 ` [Cake] Cleaning up cake Dave Taht
2017-11-17 21:19 [Cake] [RFC PATCH 0/5] patches for iproute2-net-next for netem slotting and cake Dave Taht
2017-11-17 21:19 ` [Cake] [RFC PATCH 4/5] q_netem: support delivering packets in delayed time slots Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=037FE91B-5F27-4CAD-AB56-24ED829C08F0@gmail.com \
--to=peteheist@gmail.com \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=dave@taht.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox