> On Nov 19, 2017, at 9:41 PM, Dave Taht <dave@taht.net> wrote:
> 
>> Yep with bql. I hadn’t thought about mq before. What my qos setup scripts are
>> doing though is replacing the root qdisc (which now I see defaults to mq) with a
>> single cake instance. With bql, should rather be leaving mq and putting four
>> cake instances underneath it?
> Only if you want unlimited mode, and birthday problems, and don't have
> cpu to burn.

Ok, if I compare the two, latency under load for rrul_be looks “better” (~1-1.5ms instead of ~3ms) with a single “cake unlimited besteffort lan” instance instead of four of them underneath mq.