From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 126063B25E for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 04:27:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hms-beagle.speedport_w723_v_typ_a_1_01_016 ([93.237.73.111]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M2t0Q-1b99sK3EF4-00sbj8; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 10:27:31 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) From: moeller0 In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 10:27:25 +0200 Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <04080AE6-8C47-4224-8DE3-BA374CBE38F5@gmx.de> References: <66C89432-6E70-422F-A638-7522BF233707@gmail.com> <35967373-D9F6-4C0C-8005-787DB8C7B1BB@gmx.de> <7ECE7E7A-0310-4DC4-8AC9-29B0F1F2E383@gmx.de> To: Loganaden Velvindron X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:bdAkuJrZZOB4lCLzjmCAjVwx//blGz29Rp8eGdt+xd8zi1RTFKU poRDrt8MocwYdqj05wSdT6F7JbAmJydrv0umg79gpVtuAA9K72/jwJYjl7SZXMcbj8PPqR7 CNagW30p3znMeJcf+HTHG2CXCgOUPy/PQVu44hfXtShbPOu4zfIovm8aHLCzjNZhiBOJIy/ BrLYIGQBGW9uKb9tT3T4A== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:xDC5Xv15PSc=:NLjl+6i1tKzddRis3ZlkqC CTZ91xnS7bsO8AoKSw2jq1TpflnRifFdIrTgdMcBzpXtXqc908HniIFRvsWrzBSV7riC8m6nz QztobojpKnxpaYnjNvhIQu4OvOpSjxeRLQX9AFTKx6O62w7AYrlxbFritXApd7Z4Yz2mfdvhg esPc2XqWtQHTGpG2c8ebTZjCsIDTUZfFwzhLFFNhFHHdXQFym5I3+zz9SPBqBPZgB+OIIGMFR gAKGGkc8JXAflMiEbmYYko4ioBkXEA/xvGsccbmv0ZKbFd7O0XhlQLwB8EorsE9o+1zBrq0uk PFPgo2adS/VN/gCo3tsPcrODqhMUz5ko0o0u8gngT2zYCcv7KDkxExp02UcS8fnKZ3HQCNElz sD4A3ObY64aVRspEPGPcskElIupcMDg6CYmqIh0t5Qxs4vkEAaX0oQEcvmk+j6dXX/+Y/ef5v qmSFM7z0kqMK0oyOYdnyL6gh0s3BnE5fyiuKHQaxf81zbTtMpmkjMZ0DqPoci4gSY6r2ZoXM9 gU2JYAmaPd4FanjbgFFBjtozzww9md+TVDP3BnRT/6/Hf+pwaRLhP8Ot+HSyxaPSRZoKqTCtO dX1zETlmTda2d+xBu7JMdvcs3RdmrTgLMUjOxqK+Bkv7B7FQ+fC/YJxMglR3byyW+/ALgmjfa M9GB5vJXFdFN5BA/x9th+U6OR1SEus5R2mkyIGc4zKvPyahDXlI7LQ8B4ICKFXf71j6YOnj6B Bkz0rsikP1v0ABoAFElGX3AcuQCDPcFehD/dAD9JC1ovlVL+hnaeDDw3QwS84UtjVlQljQVs4 rnTdQAY Subject: Re: [Cake] fq_codel on 3g network in Mauritius X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 08:27:33 -0000 Hi Loganaden, this is exactly the right idea; interval basically defines the = =E2=80=9Creaction time=E2=80=9D window, or the time the endpoints of a = connection minimally require to actually react to the drop/mark signal. = So on a slow link with RTTs in the order of 300ms set interval to 300ms. Target should be set to around 5-10% of interval to optimze the = bandwidth latency tradeoff, but in any case target should be larger than = the time required to send an individual packet, so that no queue builds = up for sparse flows. It is not quite clear to me whether in your case you would account the = long =E2=80=9Cpipeline=E2=80=9D depth to the target or simply = bandwidth/1540=E2=80=A6 Best Regards Sebastian > On Jul 24, 2016, at 09:03 , Loganaden Velvindron = wrote: >=20 > I am getting A to A+ for quality when setting the interval to 350ms. >=20 > http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/4520977 >=20 > I am getting - to C for quality when setting the interval to the > default value of 100ms. >=20 > http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/4520957