Cake - FQ_codel the next generation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
To: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] Cake throughput levels off during longs tests
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 11:02:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <04B47ADF-415D-49DC-B613-7E11F8248A14@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87611pfyy1.fsf@toke.dk>

Hi Toke,

On Oct 29, 2015, at 16:59 , Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> wrote:

> Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> writes:
> 
>> So I ran a couple of tests of Cake on the Archer-c7 on newest openwrt
>> trunk with sqm-scripts set to 30/30 Mbps. The attached graphs are the
>> result of equivalent fq_codel and cake settings.
>> 
>> As you can see, the cake throughput levels off over long test durations.
>> Anyone has any idea why?
> 
> Right, so did some more experiments, and this is definitely related to
> CPU usage. I did a new build of openwrt with an updated toolchain, and
> now the archer runs fine with Cake at 30 Mbps symmetrical. However, it
> starts to struggle at 50 Mbps; but only after around three minutes of
> continuous load.

	Could this be some sort of thermal throttling? The plot reminds me a bit of the currently popular plots of smartphone performance/CPU-frequency over time under load over time… I do not know whether the archer’s cpu actually can throttle… If it would be pure CPU-ooomph shouldn’t it be there from early on, 200 seconds seem too long to run out of resources like cache?

> 
> See the comparison graphs here:
> https://kau.toke.dk/experiments/cake/archer/cake-30-50.png
> 
> That directory also contains the full Flent data files and packet dumps.
> 
> So the question is now, of course, is there anything that can be done
> about this, or should we simply accept that the box is out of oomph? The
> way it behaves does strike me as weird…

	Maybe cooling it artificially during the test might reveal whether the slow down is temperature dependent? I would test myself but I do not own an archer C7…

Best Regards
	Sebastian


> 
> -Toke
> _______________________________________________
> Cake mailing list
> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake


      reply	other threads:[~2015-10-30 10:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-22 15:50 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2015-10-22 16:06 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-10-22 16:11   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2015-10-29 15:59 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2015-10-30 10:02   ` Sebastian Moeller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=04B47ADF-415D-49DC-B613-7E11F8248A14@gmx.de \
    --to=moeller0@gmx.de \
    --cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=toke@toke.dk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox