From: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
To: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: [Cake] Re: help request for cake on a large network
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2025 14:10:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <06DAA0CB-70EF-4FDD-BD3D-16A4FC28AD12@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.2509280400350.14652@nftneq.ynat.uz>
Hi David,
while I have no real answer for your questions (due to never having had that kind of load in my home network ;) ) I would like to ask you to make take scripted captures of tc -s qdisc for the wan interface is reasonable short intervals (say every 10 minutes?) as that might be just what we need to actually answer your question.
> On 28. Sep 2025, at 13:06, David Lang <david@lang.hm> wrote:
>
> I'm starting to prepare for the next Scale conference and we are switching from Juniper routers to Linux routers. This gives me the ability to implement cake.
>
> One problem we have is classes that tell everyone 'go download this' that trigger hundreds of people to hammer the network at the same time (this is both a wifi and a network bandwidth issue, wifi is being worked on)
So one issue might be that with several 100 users the default compile-time size of queues (1024, IIRC) that cake will entertain might be too little, even in light of the 8 way assoziative hashing design. I believe this can be changed (within limits) only by modifying at source and recompilation of the kernel, if that should be needed at all.
I wonder whether multi-queue cake would not solve this to some degree, as I assume each queue's instance would bring its own independent set of 1024 bins?
> The network is pretty flat, a couple of subnets each on ipv4 and ipv6.
>
> Any suggestions on how to configure cake for this sort of environment where there are so many devices?
Maybe switch to a simpler pure per-flow isolation mode than the default triple-isolate?
BTW what kind of uplink capacity will you use?
>
> David Lang
> _______________________________________________
> Cake mailing list -- cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
> To unsubscribe send an email to cake-leave@lists.bufferbloat.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-28 12:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-28 11:06 [Cake] " David Lang
2025-09-28 12:10 ` Sebastian Moeller [this message]
2025-09-28 12:17 ` [Cake] " David Lang
2025-09-28 12:12 ` Jaap de Vos
2025-09-28 12:38 ` David Lang
2025-09-28 12:56 ` Frantisek Borsik
2025-09-28 17:07 ` dave seddon
2025-09-28 17:26 ` David Lang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=06DAA0CB-70EF-4FDD-BD3D-16A4FC28AD12@gmx.de \
--to=moeller0@gmx.de \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=david@lang.hm \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox