From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf1-x12b.google.com (mail-lf1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 949263BA8E for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 06:58:04 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-lf1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id n18so3905534lfh.6 for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 03:58:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=e987KCLhP20S1YMi/9u7HhBxhM8ymuuiihhZlmVw+ts=; b=Pb7QuxXyR0hp/pn1+7bCUHL8eNkAN074R6btxGwbf/r/dtZTQ78U5VMlUj/HHF4yel N61PHvYPqjQKtazh8YQgrVYqIdKEtAOpz/Xy0+b5fdsi6ksdn7pKiT2/EwdthwLCXL6C +KQhW7PkIfqxYJyGoafUVBsL2lC7hAF7A3Nl3o+j3d2xUvV/5VtPHC6efEhgK6SeChIu Tvgg6JUotJa/bT/xhXyJ3B/Jlp6vWT4eWG2thtk5Waio4016wjcMEQu+jjnrEA4u6H7A h0ti40NLX2OsW2P9GxPFBGgGJ8R1PaLK6IAYjcLXFlzWg2LeIK3ivuTwhdpRdBcNJlr9 Uecw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=e987KCLhP20S1YMi/9u7HhBxhM8ymuuiihhZlmVw+ts=; b=APNXVBcHI3yYYKKDl9w7DfrYf/G+VWHs7SfjG8SD3Sv+JW3COD5yIzR8kAuhXiDMeD RLlPBDoNLnxbaMeGLfIOZxuDH1FPBXE7C2H296boFrXLM1VB/UFZQhlvPMr87kuzTFCc oXZWxamc/PRfWJrmJ8ndZO79fylSAbazH5Gmc8XbRpzfHHHjRYplxiFfEvEFGwOASohn Gu/9kn5RHJE0gLN/5kNG34Z7Yuwgcg7lry/689lY8v5ZIuZOz0O48MSEKWXxPMygayh1 0Fh/4IxS+b6jc+fTJ8ySYGkMgT8FO2eG0Y8P0ZleHnj0B9NUxDWFsmkzR4rsQsXzJ5nw c8Vg== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWYR5asqmqsqv2PgLH+ZNSWPRLta5TdxrPgnc0h1a7dmUJBkFte6 w7tffYWc1L/QT9V1+zi427A= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/WSNELJW0iMSpYw5ocM3TWBUkD5u3cgBuRUErL4f4PM0PjQkpZciUVgAc71VLtXRMiQjVoiEg== X-Received: by 2002:a19:5394:: with SMTP id h20mr3547226lfl.75.1543579083384; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 03:58:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from jonathartonsmbp.lan (83-245-236-220-nat-p.elisa-mobile.fi. [83.245.236.220]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d5sm770447lfi.65.2018.11.30.03.58.02 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 30 Nov 2018 03:58:02 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\)) From: Jonathan Morton In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:58:01 +0200 Cc: Dave Taht , dave@taht.net, cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <08381337-F99A-46D1-87AF-B0F71A8753BC@gmail.com> References: <87va4nzsn4.fsf@taht.net> <6578A0D1-FF6A-474E-A6D5-98185F98CB45@gmail.com> To: Jendaipou Palmei X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1) Subject: Re: [Cake] COBALT implementation in ns-3 with results under different traffic scenarios X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 11:58:04 -0000 > On 30 Nov, 2018, at 1:53 pm, Jendaipou Palmei = wrote: >=20 > However, we finally noticed that it was the packet size used in our = simulations that was affecting the throughput. It was earlier set to = 1000 bytes, and after making it 1500 bytes (including headers) we note = that the throughput is not affected. >=20 > We have uploaded the new graphs on the same wiki link: > https://github.com/Daipu/COBALT/wiki/Light-Traffic >=20 > We're not sure why packet size is affecting the throughput so largely. = Is it the expected behavior? That particular effect is probably accidental. Is it possible to also show graphs of the packet marking (or dropping) = rate? That may be revealing. - Jonathan Morton