From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
To: dave seddon <dave.seddon.ca@gmail.com>
Cc: Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cake] some comprehensive arm64 w/cake results
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 01:13:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <115D8B11-D45F-4997-A048-8E3251E86625@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANypexR5p7Lekzk7+ktfEWjFXJP2zRHC_BgGWRRzKc5QdaxubA@mail.gmail.com>
> On 18 Sep, 2023, at 10:50 pm, dave seddon via Cake <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>
> The cake tests so far had rtt 1ms and rtt 3ms, which might be too low. ( If it is too low, then maybe it would make sense to remove "rtt lan = rtt 1ms" option, as it's a misleading configuration option? )
If all your traffic is over the LAN, and you have a machine and application tuned for the extra-low latencies that a LAN can offer, then setting LAN-grade targets for Cake might make sense. But most people's traffic is a mixture, with the performance of Internet traffic being more important, and that is better served by the *default* settings.
You ran fq_codel at its default settings. These are equivalent to Cake's default settings, so far as the AQM activity is concerned. I'm just asking for a like-to-like comparison. You could be pleasantly surprised.
- Jonathan Morton
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-18 22:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-18 1:05 Dave Taht
2023-09-18 1:25 ` Jonathan Morton
2023-09-18 16:57 ` David P. Reed
2023-09-18 19:50 ` dave seddon
2023-09-18 20:24 ` David P. Reed
2023-09-18 22:07 ` Jonathan Morton
2023-09-28 11:44 ` Jonathan Morton
2023-09-28 12:15 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-09-28 12:33 ` Jonathan Morton
2023-09-28 12:56 ` David Lang
2023-09-28 13:08 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-09-28 13:19 ` David Lang
2023-09-28 13:27 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-10-13 15:59 ` dave seddon
2023-10-13 17:25 ` dave seddon
2023-10-15 15:11 ` dave seddon
2023-10-15 15:52 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-10-15 16:24 ` dave seddon
2023-10-15 20:29 ` David P. Reed
2023-10-16 3:52 ` Jonathan Morton
2023-10-15 15:53 ` Dave Taht
2023-10-23 20:31 ` dave seddon
2023-10-23 20:35 ` dave seddon
2023-10-24 16:27 ` dave seddon
2023-10-24 21:35 ` dave seddon
2023-10-24 22:06 ` Dave Taht
2023-09-18 22:13 ` Jonathan Morton [this message]
2023-09-18 22:52 ` dave seddon
2023-09-18 23:08 ` Jonathan Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=115D8B11-D45F-4997-A048-8E3251E86625@gmail.com \
--to=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.seddon.ca@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox