From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from vsmta11-2.nsc.no (vip22scan.telenor.net [148.123.15.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C04DA3B2A3 for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 09:33:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [153.110.251.168] ([153.110.251.168:57468] helo=ilp-smtp02.man.cosng.net) by vsmta11-2.nsc.no (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.6.22.53981 r(Core:3.6.22.0)) with ESMTPS (cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) id 2C/E2-23893-99443095; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 15:33:13 +0200 Received: from TNS-SKO-24-205.corp.telenor.no (TNS-SKO-24-205.corp.telenor.no [10.179.59.73]) by ilp-smtp02.man.cosng.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED78C1FCC0 for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 15:33:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from TNS-SKO-24-208.corp.telenor.no (10.179.59.76) by TNS-SKO-24-205.corp.telenor.no (10.179.59.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1178.4; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 15:33:12 +0200 Received: from TNS-SKO-24-208.corp.telenor.no ([fe80::b024:7a41:ba33:25b6]) by TNS-SKO-24-208.corp.telenor.no ([fe80::b024:7a41:ba33:25b6%12]) with mapi id 15.00.1178.000; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 15:33:12 +0200 From: To: Subject: Recomended HW to run cake and fq_codel? Thread-Topic: Recomended HW to run cake and fq_codel? Thread-Index: AQHSwCI62E19Y+ule0asGm6vMdey9g== Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 13:33:12 +0000 Message-ID: <1493386392374.52515@telenor.com> Accept-Language: nb-NO, en-US Content-Language: nb-NO X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.181.50.2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SCAN_VERDICT: inbox X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 13:33:15 -0000 Hi! I'm trying to set up a lab for testing schedulers for xDSL, fiber and coax = (and possibly LTE) CPE devices. We have several Braodcom and Intel based C= PE's with the typical hw accelerated schedulers which I would like to bench= mark agains cake and fq_codel. If there is a complete'ish system I could b= uy, that would be nice. I am aware that I can run into driver issues, larg= e buffers etc on a converted linux PC. So something like Ubiquti EdgeRoute= r, is that a reccomended platform? My end goal (if the tests show cake/fq_codel will have significant gains ov= er traditional schedulers) is to have our CPE vendors include cake/fq_codel= running in slow path. So at least we can use it for low speed accesse. A= nd possibly even influence the chipset vendors to start paying attention to= bufferbloat. Regards Erik Taraldsen