From: <erik.taraldsen@telenor.com>
To: <me@lochnair.net>
Cc: <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cake] Recomended HW to run cake and fq_codel?
Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 10:34:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1493721285271.28909@telenor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1493397540.4184.959563328.3AB236CD@webmail.messagingengine.com>
I'm actually most interested in how this works on low bandwidth accesses. Typicaly, what can we as an ISP do to make ADSL and VDSL less sucky for our customers. So an Edge Router PoE-5 1) or the X sfp 2) would be a good platform for this? (Don't need the PoE or sfp, but it's the easiest accessible version here in Norway).
Nils, very good of you to keep such packages precompiled! That will save me a lot of time.
1) https://www.komplett.no/product/867933/datautstyr/nettverk/routere/ubiquiti-edgerouter-5-port-poe
2) https://www.komplett.no/product/898813/datautstyr/nettverk/routere/ubiquiti-edgerouter-x-sfp#
-Erik
________________________________________
Fra: Lochnair <me@lochnair.net>
Sendt: 28. april 2017 18:39
Til: Taraldsen Erik
Kopi: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Emne: Re: [Cake] Recomended HW to run cake and fq_codel?
Hi Erik
I can't speak for what's "recommended" hardware for running CAKE on, but
from experience I can say that CAKE runs quite well on the EdgeRouters.
The EdgeRouter platform does not have CAKE support built-in, so I
maintain pre-compiled binaries here:
https://community.ubnt.com/topic/239619/cake-and-fq-pie-compiled-for-the-edgerouter-devices/1
In terms of expected performance, I've seen tests on the ER-Lite come
out at about ~80Mb/20Mb on a 200Mb/20Mb link. I've not been able to do
any "perf" runs on it myself, as my only one is in production. I don't
have an ER-X, but one of the guys on the UBNT forum claimed to get
~120-140 Mbit symmetric on the ER-X model.
Best Regards
Nils
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-02 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.430.1493386395.3609.cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2017-04-28 16:39 ` Lochnair
2017-05-02 10:34 ` erik.taraldsen [this message]
2017-05-02 12:11 ` Nils Andreas Svee
2017-05-02 17:36 ` David Lang
2017-05-03 5:36 ` erik.taraldsen
2017-05-03 6:51 ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-05-03 7:27 ` erik.taraldsen
2017-05-03 8:24 ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-05-03 11:14 ` erik.taraldsen
[not found] ` <mailman.433.1493397541.3609.cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2017-04-28 18:07 ` Tristan Seligmann
[not found] <mailman.1.1493740801.18318.cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2017-05-02 18:44 ` Pete Heist
2017-05-03 5:59 ` erik.taraldsen
2017-05-03 7:15 ` Pete Heist
2017-05-03 10:03 ` Andy Furniss
2017-05-03 11:10 ` erik.taraldsen
2017-11-27 8:35 ` Dave Taht
2017-11-27 12:04 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-11-27 12:47 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-27 15:54 ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-11-27 16:12 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-27 18:28 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-11-27 21:49 ` Pete Heist
[not found] <mailman.1.1493827201.27042.cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2017-05-03 18:05 ` Pete Heist
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1493721285271.28909@telenor.com \
--to=erik.taraldsen@telenor.com \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=me@lochnair.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox