From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from vsmta11-2.nsc.no (vip22scan.telenor.net [148.123.15.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B26FE3B2A3 for ; Tue, 2 May 2017 06:34:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [153.110.251.168] ([153.110.251.168:54066] helo=ilp-smtp02.man.cosng.net) by vsmta11-2.nsc.no (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.6.22.53981 r(Core:3.6.22.0)) with ESMTPS (cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) id 11/78-23801-7C068095; Tue, 02 May 2017 12:34:47 +0200 Received: from TNS-SKO-24-201.corp.telenor.no (TNS-SKO-24-201.corp.telenor.no [10.179.59.69]) by ilp-smtp02.man.cosng.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 818201FCBB; Tue, 2 May 2017 12:34:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from TNS-SKO-24-208.corp.telenor.no (10.179.59.76) by TNS-SKO-24-201.corp.telenor.no (10.179.59.69) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1178.4; Tue, 2 May 2017 12:34:45 +0200 Received: from TNS-SKO-24-208.corp.telenor.no ([fe80::b024:7a41:ba33:25b6]) by TNS-SKO-24-208.corp.telenor.no ([fe80::b024:7a41:ba33:25b6%12]) with mapi id 15.00.1178.000; Tue, 2 May 2017 12:34:45 +0200 From: To: CC: Thread-Topic: [Cake] Recomended HW to run cake and fq_codel? Thread-Index: AQHSwCP/lLDEM2lQwEWHw0Bwy0PLuKHa2hEAgAYAWQA= Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 10:34:45 +0000 Message-ID: <1493721285271.28909@telenor.com> References: , <1493397540.4184.959563328.3AB236CD@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <1493397540.4184.959563328.3AB236CD@webmail.messagingengine.com> Accept-Language: nb-NO, en-US Content-Language: nb-NO X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.181.50.7] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SCAN_VERDICT: inbox Subject: Re: [Cake] Recomended HW to run cake and fq_codel? X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 May 2017 10:34:50 -0000 I'm actually most interested in how this works on low bandwidth accesses. = Typicaly, what can we as an ISP do to make ADSL and VDSL less sucky for our= customers. So an Edge Router PoE-5 1) or the X sfp 2) would be a good pl= atform for this? (Don't need the PoE or sfp, but it's the easiest accessib= le version here in Norway).=0A= =0A= Nils, very good of you to keep such packages precompiled! That will save me= a lot of time.=0A= =0A= =0A= 1) https://www.komplett.no/product/867933/datautstyr/nettverk/routere/ubiqu= iti-edgerouter-5-port-poe=0A= 2) https://www.komplett.no/product/898813/datautstyr/nettverk/routere/ubiqu= iti-edgerouter-x-sfp#=0A= =0A= -Erik=0A= =0A= ________________________________________=0A= Fra: Lochnair =0A= Sendt: 28. april 2017 18:39=0A= Til: Taraldsen Erik=0A= Kopi: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net=0A= Emne: Re: [Cake] Recomended HW to run cake and fq_codel?=0A= =0A= Hi Erik=0A= =0A= I can't speak for what's "recommended" hardware for running CAKE on, but=0A= from experience I can say that CAKE runs quite well on the EdgeRouters.=0A= The EdgeRouter platform does not have CAKE support built-in, so I=0A= maintain pre-compiled binaries here:=0A= https://community.ubnt.com/topic/239619/cake-and-fq-pie-compiled-for-the-ed= gerouter-devices/1=0A= =0A= In terms of expected performance, I've seen tests on the ER-Lite come=0A= out at about ~80Mb/20Mb on a 200Mb/20Mb link. I've not been able to do=0A= any "perf" runs on it myself, as my only one is in production. I don't=0A= have an ER-X, but one of the guys on the UBNT forum claimed to get=0A= ~120-140 Mbit symmetric on the ER-X model.=0A= =0A= Best Regards=0A= Nils=0A= =0A=