From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0F013B29E for ; Tue, 2 May 2017 08:11:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81E5F20BB5; Tue, 2 May 2017 08:11:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web4 ([10.202.2.214]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 02 May 2017 08:11:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lochnair.net; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=XcPCP/lDc8YxHv5XcihKW+Nghv w1t8+/rJ+1tQ4Ex44=; b=Gi8caEHvMz/XkAd3qBb/cUOfJfJyMEoAQVsfKcoOx5 RMiz2UDhRNX4801ryzurdfsNlr7MpyRdwsuLUBJE+9isGDxbdaozqlzKvnhOGXTQ b5Z4rvs0nkPFCdWMJjqXjcfHP7m0UZTFekDkwaFpEvPEl1Etdo7GHvtRz77fRaK/ k= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=XcPCP/ lDc8YxHv5XcihKW+Nghvw1t8+/rJ+1tQ4Ex44=; b=S6J4eX9L2nos2PKnBGgjnO ld7pC1/V6zPDtU44zbMyPzrDv7LZJk5pGaMQQX8dgtX+eA5Hln59eHsq4GGzLsLw +GsKVYunTkJptLaD7SstpOjNY5qRuISbsV7hlgP1AstkhaHaQYdrBDd/4554iQGU oQqTpq0iuLT8wS3qJPi/xN7fhsy3gOMNoAwCCWZB/mHiYi0nujQBPdWsovifdzlO IcZa5Ekmau3v3TPTp6OnQ0XPxWj5dizOoZ9UDHlFTcscKc4fopDNfGzgYX2bdrQn iyQ78fWnL5LL4ML61R5v+ICjz7JdBvOnXLW9ddaBzpKcew5F08qw3uG2FAw65wNQ == X-ME-Sender: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 57139BAB70; Tue, 2 May 2017 08:11:20 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1493727080.1510042.962956680.40220FCB@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: Nils Andreas Svee To: erik.taraldsen@telenor.com Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-88a795dc Date: Tue, 02 May 2017 14:11:20 +0200 References: <1493397540.4184.959563328.3AB236CD@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1493721285271.28909@telenor.com> In-Reply-To: <1493721285271.28909@telenor.com> Subject: Re: [Cake] Recomended HW to run cake and fq_codel? X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 May 2017 12:11:20 -0000 Kinda surprising that the plain ER-X isn't readily available. I know Dustin used to have them, but they're out of stock. Both of them will do just fine, but I'd probably pick the ER-X-SFP for the beefier CPU, if only to get some extra headroom. Mind the ER-X only have 256 MB RAM and 256 MB flash, if that matters to you. DSL tends to suck pretty (read: very) bad without proper shaping, I know. On that note, are you planning to run an AQM on both ends of the bottleneck, or shape ingress traffic via a IFB device? CAKE helps a lot when running on ingress, but it can't come close to running on both ends. Best Regards Nils On Tue, May 2, 2017, at 12:34, erik.taraldsen@telenor.com wrote: > I'm actually most interested in how this works on low bandwidth accesses. > Typicaly, what can we as an ISP do to make ADSL and VDSL less sucky for > our customers. So an Edge Router PoE-5 1) or the X sfp 2) would be a > good platform for this? (Don't need the PoE or sfp, but it's the easiest > accessible version here in Norway). > > Nils, very good of you to keep such packages precompiled! That will save > me a lot of time. > > > 1) > https://www.komplett.no/product/867933/datautstyr/nettverk/routere/ubiquiti-edgerouter-5-port-poe > 2) > https://www.komplett.no/product/898813/datautstyr/nettverk/routere/ubiquiti-edgerouter-x-sfp# > > -Erik > > ________________________________________ > Fra: Lochnair > Sendt: 28. april 2017 18:39 > Til: Taraldsen Erik > Kopi: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net > Emne: Re: [Cake] Recomended HW to run cake and fq_codel? > > Hi Erik > > I can't speak for what's "recommended" hardware for running CAKE on, but > from experience I can say that CAKE runs quite well on the EdgeRouters. > The EdgeRouter platform does not have CAKE support built-in, so I > maintain pre-compiled binaries here: > https://community.ubnt.com/topic/239619/cake-and-fq-pie-compiled-for-the-edgerouter-devices/1 > > In terms of expected performance, I've seen tests on the ER-Lite come > out at about ~80Mb/20Mb on a 200Mb/20Mb link. I've not been able to do > any "perf" runs on it myself, as my only one is in production. I don't > have an ER-X, but one of the guys on the UBNT forum claimed to get > ~120-140 Mbit symmetric on the ER-X model. > > Best Regards > Nils >