From: <erik.taraldsen@telenor.com>
To: <peteheist@gmail.com>
Cc: <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cake] Recomended HW to run cake and fq_codel?
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 11:10:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1493809816975.62837@telenor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C0580931-127C-4ECF-A637-9AEA7DE92D40@gmail.com>
> Fra: Pete Heist <peteheist@gmail.com>
>
> Another option for ISPs (failing AQM support in the devices, and instead of deploying devices on the customer
> side), could be to provide each customer a queue that’s tuned to their link rate. There could be an HTB tree
> with classes for each customer and Cake at the leafs. Knowing each customer’s link rate (assuming it’s not
> variable) you’d set HTB’s rate to something less than that. There would be work to do as each customer is
> added and removed, but at least it would be transparent to them. AQM is best done at egress where packets
> originate, so I’m not sure how well it would work in practice.
We are limited by what the HW can do here. The Juniper ERX's we use aggregate multiple 10.000's of users. So Queue handeling must be supported in silicone. We do have a queue pr customer, but we cant support HTB.
> What’s usually used for an ADSL provider’s backhaul, fiber?
I'm not sure what our competition use, but we mainly use fiber. There are some edge cases using alternative backhaul such as radio. Norway has challenging topology for infrastructure, so some will have to suffer unfortunately. :)
-Erik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-03 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.1.1493740801.18318.cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2017-05-02 18:44 ` Pete Heist
2017-05-03 5:59 ` erik.taraldsen
2017-05-03 7:15 ` Pete Heist
2017-05-03 10:03 ` Andy Furniss
2017-05-03 11:10 ` erik.taraldsen [this message]
2017-11-27 8:35 ` Dave Taht
2017-11-27 12:04 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-11-27 12:47 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-27 15:54 ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-11-27 16:12 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-27 18:28 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-11-27 21:49 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-28 18:15 ` [Cake] Simple metrics Dave Taht
2017-11-28 22:14 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-28 22:41 ` Dave Taht
2017-11-29 8:08 ` Sebastian Moeller
[not found] <mailman.1.1493827201.27042.cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2017-05-03 18:05 ` [Cake] Recomended HW to run cake and fq_codel? Pete Heist
[not found] <mailman.430.1493386395.3609.cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2017-04-28 16:39 ` Lochnair
2017-05-02 10:34 ` erik.taraldsen
2017-05-02 12:11 ` Nils Andreas Svee
2017-05-02 17:36 ` David Lang
2017-05-03 5:36 ` erik.taraldsen
2017-05-03 6:51 ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-05-03 7:27 ` erik.taraldsen
2017-05-03 8:24 ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-05-03 11:14 ` erik.taraldsen
[not found] ` <mailman.433.1493397541.3609.cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2017-04-28 18:07 ` Tristan Seligmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1493809816975.62837@telenor.com \
--to=erik.taraldsen@telenor.com \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=peteheist@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox