From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
To: Funshun Wang <qydwhotmail@gmail.com>
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] Using cake on IMQ interfaces: when to use the "nat" option?
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 11:17:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14D6D4C1-1835-44D1-BE7C-C42FDA99A65F@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E34FCA82DBED6D23.bccc859f-be40-478e-95e4-17ac68867bbc@mail.outlook.com>
> On 14 Feb, 2018, at 11:13 am, Funshun Wang <qydwhotmail@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> So on which interface should I enable the "nat" option, imq0, imq1, both or none?
Both. This ensures Cake sees the correct internal IP addresses, which are relevant for the various "dual", "triple" and "host" flow-modes.
- Jonathan Morton
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-14 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-14 9:13 Funshun Wang
2018-02-14 9:17 ` Jonathan Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14D6D4C1-1835-44D1-BE7C-C42FDA99A65F@gmail.com \
--to=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=qydwhotmail@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox