From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-x231.google.com (mail-lf0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72AB63CB3E for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 04:17:37 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-lf0-x231.google.com with SMTP id g72so28497500lfg.5 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 01:17:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=sryqTCEs7SlEMeTiv1af63XuIYySfdoj/+TbHWSTnOw=; b=N5vXXc5LFazQAGZF3HKjqA51fb3si7c5Xvd5d/GbPjQmZ+VtMsA0d6N+OHV7i6JvXW OPscO2xIKjaqWAtsZ4q9DTZrPxWuILdWvMfJGsbuMU1gBO02+NtK2qfr1wTm0nQ61Adv PubCb24ID837RsOxkzokpzG/N+bO2uWTP9F/pWPSFITjJJXvi6Tg5V+c3je5XbaBuT6N GKrbtskFiV011w6Pv1+b1cMgW1tAwc1D+RT28ns5y9n7htdOHREap5c4lOyB4k29CbY/ Q2w79uXx3MRIWcc0m7fCKa25Tw1i1ZhPUXnnviuBxybs2A3sdpjfIpIlIsz4Cs8kXnmQ kdgw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=sryqTCEs7SlEMeTiv1af63XuIYySfdoj/+TbHWSTnOw=; b=eSP47U7z+/H996Z7HVJ8ggDvNF1o1mEdvyUBtDhWyBgzVj9sx8nVBhNR2l9Oe4AM2P VjbsoeXRBb2ZjIPTO8a+Uz7Ie+xnZ+LSW6OJkafIl5402QOhPVuiVEZyFWwuYbtTGoDB mH7XNON0iJ/kEBAlVnPUg8px0hBisv/AHuePI+Xp9veS79kRwRu54mFSr2OtYm70Ju6Y ArGkG1TouffGSFI1e9ge9RqftdiNttRjsJoCyOVEFAuIiIhjxHnc2H7tQ4wXqN6qkbl3 dd9t0CELX9RoOaSJIcgrjrXC6+2RiAHYonqS4HVzMWSQqqz/94b60pxkngXhHY+J8Glh 6cIA== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPCuzECR7y9iueW0vsluMQQ8kJtBpvt4t/046hmB5KAHC3rDPUtt I017UlQbZKFp2xu7p2fPBS4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227uWo4mm1bPlcOW+dKq5wICx7rue+SfosjY2obflnCRHDTGVz1knvfeATYM6LJgvYgdl6wsKg== X-Received: by 10.25.219.8 with SMTP id s8mr3031730lfg.31.1518599856249; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 01:17:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.239.216] (83-245-233-185-nat-p.elisa-mobile.fi. [83.245.233.185]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z4sm2394566ljz.20.2018.02.14.01.17.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 14 Feb 2018 01:17:35 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\)) From: Jonathan Morton In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 11:17:34 +0200 Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <14D6D4C1-1835-44D1-BE7C-C42FDA99A65F@gmail.com> References: To: Funshun Wang X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20) Subject: Re: [Cake] Using cake on IMQ interfaces: when to use the "nat" option? X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 09:17:37 -0000 > On 14 Feb, 2018, at 11:13 am, Funshun Wang = wrote: >=20 > So on which interface should I enable the "nat" option, imq0, imq1, = both or none?=20 Both. This ensures Cake sees the correct internal IP addresses, which = are relevant for the various "dual", "triple" and "host" flow-modes. - Jonathan Morton