From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt0-x22e.google.com (mail-qt0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98D753B2A4 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 21:30:25 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qt0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id g10so14043451qtj.12 for ; Wed, 06 Dec 2017 18:30:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=US/4CQBVq+B6BKvPKxV0lfnIoAKWo6b0C4k8iOzDocU=; b=s/Gei72htx0vv1dHY4LHXbzSJFKY+oKd8Ph49o+BguJZInyuqmRW24VJTM6VLyII7p +oOBmx/jlLkr6Ry4DTCZQAIlGmX2lnbwy+hpWrwZM2PYw+pDsMN5lBnRvZmPWGfr4apx TT8Ubgp0e+ndi8nhRSyWzWl9xBcGnGWoyJv41g9sFNMAYd7KmVBTjvbRA1YkEDCJhH29 7LPiphtU1mwRGf5Uo/QKptfQcWbaeUzsFOmY+/OSO9ICcTijUgZoqXtoHfLzNsSPY1b5 EwEovcRJG2TWgxWzzkcqK41KolU3XtFYC5XtsKZNPJ0oIxc6tlK3biTW5bPf/VgNj4Uf KmlQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=US/4CQBVq+B6BKvPKxV0lfnIoAKWo6b0C4k8iOzDocU=; b=A4MTIeHbf42id6fxJRKFCeA3Nd65r7eXynYHgUbgwjrz+404S0q11yhPZE8qkGhx6X 5fi7rWHKZnsBKjEbZgloSSrocyatDSgpkKyrkWlUJkH0L9allpHBU1f7F7L6jA1tEkHu bKAkfj2ZtFJn3QPQ/SvGcK+uHzPhycLx1keLuTaL9o4H1LmM6WjNL4XwsO7tCI89z4US WvZwKyB+ADODwSRyZhSwyHiZ5tjzqoyCSusII2pyVRF/66EtfF3W6fxPbsw6i3Ibjl8p 3GPUoa38dEy/rH2WP3PELOD6G0aSmSNtzeC04IcfZWI/cu0DWUSCJQwAcYJOVc8vw4yc dvnA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mKbaukoNRPbikod7ZgNVIjXEYBikKW7pUMIMzc1p3X/y2cqNrJW MRta8hk8ishh7+6iHzFslBY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZzfAM6H86923i4OVs82a1Ods1BGVxlI/lbqYEXKfiEv9JMh3fJaGEw31+9nFGEFxBA9YLauA== X-Received: by 10.55.16.86 with SMTP id a83mr26534163qkh.222.1512613824962; Wed, 06 Dec 2017 18:30:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from scythe-thinkpad ([2601:152:4303:bd5::7360]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r55sm2894321qta.57.2017.12.06.18.30.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 06 Dec 2017 18:30:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1512613823.10688.0.camel@gmail.com> From: George Amanakis To: Jonathan Morton , Dave =?ISO-8859-1?Q?T=E4ht?= Cc: Cake List Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2017 21:30:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: <1512426648.21759.19.camel@gmail.com> <1512436395.8927.10.camel@gmail.com> <1512445837.3088.2.camel@gmail.com> <87vahkdgg0.fsf@nemesis.taht.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Cake] cake vs fqcodel with 1 client, 4 servers X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2017 02:30:25 -0000 I will try to get a run using the same setup. On Thu, 2017-12-07 at 04:27 +0200, Jonathan Morton wrote: > The latest push now enforces 4 x MTU x flows on the target intra-flow > latency. When lightly loaded, the normal target still applies. > This gives a noticeable improvement on the goodput of World of > Warships' updater, which does its level best to stuff 150 HTTP flows > through my 512Kbps downlink, while retaining reasonable inter-flow > latency as measured by using other applications and/or hosts. > I'd like to see a more controlled test of this, to compare with the > previous behaviour. > - Jonathan Morton