Re: [Cake] cake vs fqcodel with 1 client, 4 servers

[George Amanakis <gamanakis@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 939 bytes --]

4servers  --   delay   --   isp   --   mbox   --   1client
netserver     10/10ms     10/2mbit    9/1.8mbit    flent

net.ipv4.tcp_ecn=2
11down/2upstream flows using 4 parallel rrul_be_nflows

cobalt branch
cake params: rtt 20ms triple-isolate ack-filter

cake_4mtu --> r402 with ingress
cake_noadjust --> r400 with ingress
cake_noing --> r400 without ingress



On Thu, 2017-12-07 at 04:27 +0200, Jonathan Morton wrote:
> The latest push now enforces 4 x MTU x flows on the target intra-flow 
> latency.  When lightly loaded, the normal target still applies.
> This gives a noticeable improvement on the goodput of World of
> Warships' updater, which does its level best to stuff 150 HTTP flows
> through my 512Kbps downlink, while retaining reasonable inter-flow
> latency as measured by using other applications and/or hosts.
> I'd like to see a more controlled test of this, to compare with the
> previous behaviour.
> - Jonathan Morton

[-- Attachment #2: rrulbe_11_4_4servers_1client_10mbit_2mbit_cake_ingress.tgz --]
[-- Type: application/x-compressed-tar, Size: 1927267 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3: boxcombine_cake_ingress.png.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 104088 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #4: boxtotals_cake_ingress.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 133037 bytes --]