From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-x235.google.com (mail-lf0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0639E3B260 for ; Fri, 6 May 2016 00:44:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-lf0-x235.google.com with SMTP id u64so119006961lff.3 for ; Thu, 05 May 2016 21:44:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=DljMEPQPmg/aowpKGGY27Fn5SmsN4gstY88ahEG/RNw=; b=cOkHmU5g3q+cZGAc2EOZrNl8jhAvmu/ZPAGPHEaaR1VLmxQVELGAPdrNtZWKXSZ2yZ i1uHuywsVzM1IPl/rbZP0cKC/Qpi/BHtISl7EiQCv2ZBCE33cW2hXvGpt8+JwPmxUXex zP+3z6S88Y3WXIZv6GHfQv9bZiv3PbFFE540HnxofnXIJewpu8nGMgQy7xe8MKc05XjF ocZ4r7e3gKckLcMx3vDlNW526VhYwdygmHIcIqr/ka0tQaf3kChBAZSdC3IBEaDOkf8G 5hsGAZShkEOQJTrKIt8W/0eOI+1/Z9CwmSLQlu4rEuTfxI7VjQMbJ1vJE2KOZK/ds5T+ eZ7w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=DljMEPQPmg/aowpKGGY27Fn5SmsN4gstY88ahEG/RNw=; b=DgkcDkK2CzZfR1IdtnUPfTLGH4zqQWjtq6r343wlgXAsvoiWJjZZtahcoH/h0pVpNY K8yZam/35e6OMNOWIKpnKcilshFiR73nGXltv6WzHcIDnFUUbBAT4/FR80htBdTE9BB2 4Oe00mu+LuG9RUJ6apXnxT3w8dDOVsQ4N4pP15doBUpsy/vgzu26jR9YK7HhrMul8Jzv jBn9tTmcuMjgzRzkSxXTJIMw1wpDLFf2X2vKKuZosvVMj8mVgI35Y6NzawzHXCsJ8j9V 2Yg7Xsezgbh6MQpZeYWbKJCSdkyFbM9+O2TrSiza7/SC86tcTGc9wd0+nJlP5VbP10Cx iPVw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUBlbLje5EZf5oKqgSIpe6jCJa0Qu0ClDj2/PorNtC6VO2BJ0duccAKqJOQV3BaqQ== X-Received: by 10.112.135.230 with SMTP id pv6mr8635193lbb.68.1462509865944; Thu, 05 May 2016 21:44:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bass.home.chromatix.fi (87-93-84-153.bb.dnainternet.fi. [87.93.84.153]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 28sm2114571lfx.43.2016.05.05.21.44.24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 05 May 2016 21:44:25 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) From: Jonathan Morton In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 07:44:23 +0300 Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1577AB06-3C14-43D1-92AD-E37CEDCB8E11@gmail.com> References: <1462125592.5535.194.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> <865DA393-262D-40B6-A9D3-1B978CD5F6C6@gmail.com> <1462128385.5535.200.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> <1462136140.5535.219.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> <1462201620.5535.250.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> <1462205669.5535.254.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> <2D83E4F6-03DD-4421-AAE0-DD3C6A8AFCE0@gmail.com> To: Dave Taht X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) Subject: Re: [Cake] Fwd: [Codel] fq_codel_drop vs a udp flood X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 04:44:27 -0000 > On 6 May, 2016, at 07:35, Dave Taht wrote: >=20 > this would be a pretty nifty feature for cake to have in this hostile = universe. Yes, but difficult to implement since the trailing fragments lose the = proto/port information, and thus get sorted into a different queue than = the leading fragment. We would essentially need to implement the same = tracking mechanisms as for actual reassembly. - Jonathan Morton