From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-x231.google.com (mail-lf0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::231]) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B55553B2A3 for ; Sat, 16 Jan 2016 04:35:48 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-lf0-x231.google.com with SMTP id c192so295886267lfe.2 for ; Sat, 16 Jan 2016 01:35:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=YmEwmyHNiokioaraY02HU1YeINxpQFtrvChDvPnymO0=; b=bK4gM7CQapbD0kO/ZbnuMRz7RtsCZkd33Jd7HVAioUZ6KiIbjvWsoORdU/NJoM+sba 358drGntG6M/niSiwKl/Vkfw1JaSq6mmaPqquTiZI8pbV4duCdZ+XdJZyZnnWZ/wVerj NL5UrXSdR0KhygWdMCHn1gaeisZY6llzH34FGMdLrqrmlJo3ft0y/I4/e1D6NPA8Aew5 202ocL7sfKjV/CVUyizahA/Ixw8cniNdLM9Mib3GIDPPxkk6LS+vGYn2+YmR5p6dz62S hSe1GOYzBCxapCyNLx9tx8bRAZ2I+O7qogLMdHs85oOm2cQ9VDEty2vkQsP+4L1Tg/EW RnFA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=YmEwmyHNiokioaraY02HU1YeINxpQFtrvChDvPnymO0=; b=bm/ZW2U2QbnXjZUCN8Mzpm6nmMihxWkXsyKz8SwzvLCDDpBqdNOGLMtygMEZXFu8uQ nMLXg0G5KwAooX+EJzgwCukv0dkqnXRbQ0vdvt1LqGUzmFiUyl7tr+rJWNcoZIdT+ihN tfz0NeXXMI1UXl0H6yQo+RTQyvf3M+JrFCRKC1ymkypzKGM2z57NSuu5FBAV5HisdNNY nqJBhMx0901ksg4+ZkPrm+eX9UD/EZr3voQFADcXJ2yy5IHOW96o7NfTA5deXlWeQpcX N5PKN96odEO/7A7WlI8YJN6sfE9MyFc7QNvS1I4eUsi1waQmVd25fmOhTrbeyP1iVc8g Nk1g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQll0qvtF2EzjUXi4VrdQIRtelTfvgscY98TbmG06Q0UDK/3KjtXt4QzBunmSK92GWH+rayrIwIIihQfQc7zqzoAJi4PAw== X-Received: by 10.25.160.1 with SMTP id j1mr5107980lfe.35.1452936947337; Sat, 16 Jan 2016 01:35:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.238.201] (37-33-99-74.bb.dnainternet.fi. [37.33.99.74]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 64sm1868440lfx.19.2016.01.16.01.35.46 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 16 Jan 2016 01:35:46 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\)) From: Jonathan Morton In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 11:35:43 +0200 Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1623CDD6-922A-4FBE-8161-46919CAC1C5A@gmail.com> References: <5693E8FA.4000803@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> <56941191.1010601@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> <452D0F47-931B-4412-AC59-C308388AA1E4@gmail.com> <02A10F37-145C-4BF9-B428-BC1BDF700135@gmx.de> To: moeller0 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112) Subject: Re: [Cake] triple flow isolation X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 09:35:48 -0000 > On 16 Jan, 2016, at 11:05, Jonathan Morton = wrote: >=20 > The opposite sense would be to have the side with the smaller number = of hosts govern the system. This would, I think, handle both the swarm = and shard cases better than the above, so I=E2=80=99ll see if I can = think of a way to adapt the algorithm to do that. This turned out to be quite easy, going back to a slightly earlier (and = happily simpler) version of the core algorithm. I did say that the = details of incrementing the per-host counters were the major source of = subtleties. = https://github.com/dtaht/sch_cake/commit/2add740a79bb50b04e0497400a501df7b= 1857f48 - Jonathan Morton