From: "Justin Kilpatrick" <justin@althea.net>
To: "Dave Taht" <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] Advantages to tightly tuning latency
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 19:06:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <189eb1a9-ea02-452b-92f3-8005f97eb612@www.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw7kfSjuQP2j8uX5-+hs2PBLNZ6c0=tV=PjZE50fQ1oFLw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020, at 2:44 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> It has always been my dream, that at least for outbound, there would
> be sufficient backpressure from the driver
> to not have to shape at all, or monitor the link. We have that now in
> BQL and AQL. free.fr's dsl driver "does the right thing" - no other
> dsl driver does. Nor usb network devices. I hope more folk roll up
> their sleeves and test the ath10k some, it's looking lovely from here.
>
> https://forum.openwrt.org/t/aql-and-the-ath10k-is-lovely/
>
> next up either the new mediatek chip or intel..
I'm curious if you have any opinions about the WiFi stacks for the Marvel Armada and Qualcomm IPQ40xx. Any trees I should be barking up for better performance? We have had some complaints in higher interference areas...
These devices have the best WireGuard performance per dollar for Althea's use case so we're deploying them pretty heavily.
--
Justin Kilpatrick
justin@althea.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-21 23:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-21 18:22 Justin Kilpatrick
2020-04-21 18:40 ` Jonathan Morton
2020-04-21 18:44 ` Dave Taht
2020-04-21 22:25 ` Thibaut
2020-04-21 22:33 ` Jonathan Morton
2020-04-21 22:44 ` Dave Taht
2020-04-21 22:50 ` Dave Taht
2020-04-21 23:07 ` Jonathan Morton
2020-04-21 23:27 ` Dave Taht
2020-04-22 8:28 ` Thibaut
2020-04-22 9:03 ` Luca Muscariello
2020-04-22 14:48 ` Dave Taht
2020-04-22 15:28 ` Luca Muscariello
2020-04-22 17:42 ` David P. Reed
2020-04-23 9:29 ` Maxime Bizon
2020-04-23 11:57 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-04-23 12:29 ` Luca Muscariello
2020-04-23 12:33 ` Maxime Bizon
2020-04-23 16:42 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-04-23 17:31 ` Maxime Bizon
2020-04-23 18:30 ` Sebastian Moeller
2020-04-23 21:53 ` Maxime Bizon
2020-04-23 18:35 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-04-23 21:59 ` Maxime Bizon
2020-04-23 23:05 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-04-23 23:11 ` Dave Taht
2020-04-23 16:28 ` Dave Taht
2020-04-21 23:06 ` Justin Kilpatrick [this message]
2020-04-21 23:19 ` Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=189eb1a9-ea02-452b-92f3-8005f97eb612@www.fastmail.com \
--to=justin@althea.net \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox