From: "Nils Andreas Svee" <me@lochnair.net>
To: "Cake List" <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cake] CAKE on the bonding interface (master) or the bondedinterfaces (slaves)?
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2025 20:45:12 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <196300b6-d329-46ea-ac32-e564c2bfbc18@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPB3MF4ApjawJtr=spCr92rBvPBwBnwGmwR+fsGdPot0pM6_zQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 820 bytes --]
Are you using the shaper (i.e. setting a bandwidth) or shaping on ingress as well?
If so, I'd apply CAKE on the virtual NIC, but if you're running line rate and have a physical NIC with BQL support in the driver, I'd do each individual NIC
(assuming the bonding driver isn't able to do BQL)
Best Regards
Nils
On Thu, Jan 16, 2025, at 09:57, cam enih via Cake wrote:
> Hi CAKE folks,
>
> I'm new to traffic shaping, just a quick question here:
>
> I have this virtual NIC set up and a few physical NICs bonded to it. Shall I apply the CAKE algorithm on the virtual one or the physical ones, or all of them? If either can do it, which is the best?
>
> Thanks,
> Eric
> _______________________________________________
> Cake mailing list
> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1395 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-06 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-16 2:57 [Cake] CAKE on the bonding interface (master) or the bonded interfaces (slaves)? cam enih
2025-06-06 13:45 ` Nils Andreas Svee [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=196300b6-d329-46ea-ac32-e564c2bfbc18@app.fastmail.com \
--to=me@lochnair.net \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox