From: Andy Furniss <adf.lists@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] Putting cake under dsmark on ingress ifb
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 23:14:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1dfdac92-42b6-2406-2487-964f3cccad86@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5c6be902-a9a4-87d1-3b09-35da09be5c59@gmail.com>
Andy Furniss wrote:
> TODO see if it's possible with actions to set dscp when using connmark to
> choose the flow.
So I had a go at this and got a working solution - with some
interesting fails on the way.
My ISP doesn't do ipv6 so that is untested and wouldn't work for anyone
using any examples I post here in the sense that I use protocol ip.
So a working test = use iptables to set a connmark 1 for this test on
something then -
tc qdisc add dev ppp0 ingress
tc filter add dev ppp0 parent ffff: prio 1 protocol ip u32 match u32 0 0
action connmark continue
tc filter add dev ppp0 parent ffff: prio 2 protocol ip handle 1 fw
action xt -j DSCP --set-dscp-class cs1 action mirred egress redirect dev
ifb0
tc filter add dev ppp0 parent ffff: prio 3 protocol ip u32 match u32 0 0
action mirred egress redirect dev ifb0
Minor nit with this method = directly matching unmarked like
.... handle 0 fw .... doesn't work, so you need to allow for that or
test ematch which IIRC can do nfmark - untested by me.
The fail = try to use something like
tc filter add dev ppp0 parent ffff: prio 1 protocol ip u32 match u32 0 0
action xt -j CONNMARK --restore-mark action continue
Testing on my router box with old iptables this was accepted OK but
didn't actually work.
I updated iptables and rebuilt cake-iproute against the new version
to see if it made any difference - tc segfaulted.
Moving testing to my desktop which has a newer kernel I got the same
result.
Next test = use vanilla git iproute2, even worse = Oops. So may be
best to avoid that one for now :-).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-01 23:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-26 13:41 Andy Furniss
2017-02-26 13:47 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-02-26 14:30 ` Andy Furniss
2017-02-28 14:11 ` Andy Furniss
2017-02-28 14:23 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-03-01 23:14 ` Andy Furniss [this message]
2017-03-04 17:43 ` Andy Furniss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1dfdac92-42b6-2406-2487-964f3cccad86@gmail.com \
--to=adf.lists@gmail.com \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=chromatix99@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox