From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-x231.google.com (mail-pa0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33B6E3B2A2 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 17:00:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pa0-x231.google.com with SMTP id tt10so106720011pab.3 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 14:00:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=40I5fx54xCsvqUjgowAqsBHwNnwgO2ZDQXeBsutvHoQ=; b=LpdsUKeUStCPqfIJGEgQGb68ydsf42tuRboFOOpKt/pNu8x4w7Zbviq/ag7CkAGWQ1 4J1q2LEiW61WixVuUpqLDToy0tTYNolST1VXSkXKTBuHK6LW9WfAelFaUYUHfLrjqCRy gaJCkZilE7OhVsqgsn6Kx8twa2HLT+gIyLlXznCzIWLUTI/sJvihwdxVudqutW+IBhen +XeP0OLorsCOfdwbSHoKACBvcuEeGPHbWu1lM8LS7NDfm+smN0elbLBKeAwoWuTa4avE ADm8g92FeWZ+FyPyMFdx+WwusRkdzv7KI+OKheTIPfhSyAZR6x9CEVDAGftIv4vrsA+z FZ7Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=40I5fx54xCsvqUjgowAqsBHwNnwgO2ZDQXeBsutvHoQ=; b=Y+UawZj1WTZVWKnVreYatsXxRO+Iiwhl595pVfIy0NCMzWE+RASFGZ+lN/SdjreJTb g9O0lyfx1l4qoHFH8nU4uALb7gCZ6EhyNl3StzjeaShNzTpDAolAVF9VQeR0hheVEvSF s+SbtUE2+twiJJCFVfquI6m9DPVRJFCw0j1XHxk+ToGJ9LWkTHxrGhYcKE3w4l2M4CX6 TGgZgKDqfYmPR0QMgWvB4lKQhKfB1SAzja7Oykg5mOr/4VSJ2nsDBuI4qXT2Nkka3YCd sMWmRJJ20xRds508rAnViFZ9MW9gFCGBClwxibn8eF0APme4QpXGPgTBS4B6O8qSqprf 8pLA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJL53Fvf2/9k8CJ+XGiRRr5jx1WorD+0Rq2Y5mViQ+4MuiJJ+NXXknI7hbOs307Pzw== X-Received: by 10.66.244.15 with SMTP id xc15mr45721712pac.97.1459198848332; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 14:00:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xeon-e3 (static-50-53-65-230.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net. [50.53.65.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k88sm37809248pfj.0.2016.03.28.14.00.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 28 Mar 2016 14:00:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 14:01:04 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Jonathan Morton Cc: Allan Pinto , cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Message-ID: <20160328140104.3c55079e@xeon-e3> In-Reply-To: <198CD4FC-6BD4-40DA-BE2F-22BBBA1E204D@gmail.com> References: <34953EAA-4C76-456E-9B9E-3A73D0DACCDE@gmail.com> <855E3354-30E6-4658-AF38-A0C1E92085CE@gmail.com> <66A00804-E571-4A44-BE3E-422F78C1F1F7@gmail.com> <198CD4FC-6BD4-40DA-BE2F-22BBBA1E204D@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Cake] cake separate qos for lan X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 21:00:49 -0000 On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 22:20:58 +0300 Jonathan Morton wrote: > Did you try the IMQ alternative? I don=E2=80=99t see any reason why it s= houldn=E2=80=99t work, as long as you can build a kernel with IMQ support. IMQ was abandoned by original author because there was no way to make it re= liable and SMP safe.