From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp6-g21.free.fr (smtp6-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD0A13CB37 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2019 09:13:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from eos (unknown [213.61.153.180]) (Authenticated sender: albeu) by smtp6-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 93D137802E5; Mon, 1 Jul 2019 13:13:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 15:13:16 +0200 From: Alban To: Toke =?UTF-8?B?SMO4aWxhbmQtSsO4cmdlbnNlbg==?= Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net, Alban Message-ID: <20190701151316.2f037eea@eos> In-Reply-To: <87tvc654he.fsf@toke.dk> References: <20190701135251.08defe75@eos> <87tvc654he.fsf@toke.dk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/R3Jr2h7CStzFC3R.jdT06EI"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 01 Jul 2019 09:24:31 -0400 Subject: Re: [Cake] Recommendations for using cake in complex setup (wireguard + vlan + bond) X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2019 13:13:23 -0000 --Sig_/R3Jr2h7CStzFC3R.jdT06EI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 01 Jul 2019 14:22:37 +0200 Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote: > Alban writes: >=20 > > Hi everybody, > > > > I am setting a new router with a non trivial setup and I really > > like to get some recommendations on how to best use cake. First of > > all the router is using VLAN on top of 2 bonded gigabit Ethernet > > interface: > > > > +--> VLAN1 (LAN) > > eth0 <--+ | > > +---> bond0 <--+--> VLAN2 (WAN1) > > eth1 <--+ | > > +--> VLAN3 (WAN2) > > > > The bond is using LACP, but mainly for redundancy and not for the > > increased bandwidth. Both WAN VLAN are going to ISP provided > > FritzBox connected to 50/10Mbit VDSL2 lines. =20 >=20 > What are the physical interfaces connected to? How is the traffic > getting to the FritzBoxes? I should have mentioned that the above diagram depict the logical interfaces inside the router. The router only physical connection is via the bond to a switch stack, the logical separation of LAN and WAN is done using VLANs. The physical interfaces (eth0/1) are gigabit Ethernet, one FritzBox is directly connected to the same switch, the second one is connected via yet another switches as it is not in the same physical location. Like this: (VLAN1) (VLAN1) clients clients | | +-----+ +-----+ Router <-->| SW1 |<---->| SW2 | +--+--+ +--+--+ | | FB1 FB2 (VLAN2) (VLAN3) Alban --Sig_/R3Jr2h7CStzFC3R.jdT06EI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE0W61GceYqNjiMSkodJSaS524LbwFAl0aBuwACgkQdJSaS524 LbwVJBAArtJRG27bfzo3Jcqw+H8P+bRRtXx2LoNSbrpWJcGpk32sw8rwyV4r4pNw Wq2DCfeAttEqY21gs5mAgjk1gXqcRG3MDDpk5YqiV2FO/b0LoVGrTKBKduzzeH42 Zx7qglkDpHjGFgh6pPEDNkhJMyzcX0wzZZoQb2n3SPP8P5FlJA0sbzwjwlYqnYdl cKDGdHKO1Fm1ZckZLeakgct2HW+E8oq4zjw/0Na2g/+FNFdcWHy5xtxVVEz1LO9b b37M9RJTSI2LRIMLusHoD/efBXkMHy4aMkEVW8lGFZqHAzEAgC3Pm/rsWpyX7tj7 zy5OLD07aDRXQnB46vFVeMtvJz74399oOct5m9EOTjlGN5GviFhe1zaCKS74kR5A 47Wz6iaY2qoKSN7ln1VTxzUSh0UowdMHqMW1GC5YSmZO/43vKuQE9iGgGhgp8Z9d U4Yx0C7uBkJoDC65bqU+G6yncxGgmfAEU9+0S9u9xTnCBUWtnSyfX8010muY6xmi K8ejlnRs4APsC394WRft9AjySDPyomL3zdeWAjca64QqZeyb80CkldgD8+Wx+OOf F1i1cc6ogCDt753sFPoXTFRspfKn0gjtbMR7g4Y8GyiSoIYMFFCi67rKsk9LL1z1 G5cqJ/qv4x7FFP7R76DXGIJbFz1F2U+qeHxO7oFFcwFGt3Dzls4= =M6z5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/R3Jr2h7CStzFC3R.jdT06EI--