From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=oKsHaE=6H=freebox.fr=mbizon@srs.iliad.fr>
Received: from ns.iliad.fr (ns.iliad.fr [212.27.33.1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED24A3B2A4
 for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 17:53:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ns.iliad.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ns.iliad.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEF1B202C7;
 Thu, 23 Apr 2020 23:53:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from sakura (freebox.vlq16.iliad.fr [213.36.7.13])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ns.iliad.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E15ED20289;
 Thu, 23 Apr 2020 23:53:08 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 23:53:07 +0200
From: Maxime Bizon <mbizon@freebox.fr>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
Cc: Toke =?iso-8859-1?Q?H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen?= <toke@redhat.com>,
 Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Message-ID: <20200423215307.GM28541@sakura>
References: <603DFF79-D0C0-41BD-A2FB-E40B95A9CBB0@gmail.com>
 <CAA93jw5yvybv+aXH4NLd1r_8xSP2CPwzeh0q6wm1c26jLPBxag@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAH8sseTdDfswOYpYvaDFm_jsaMCpsT9Ebj2ZvkKwaqyyjZiWHA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAA93jw54L6-mUU9oTgZVFHh5kY7HHGVQjZJZfUMw7Kuq+S9-8w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200423092909.GC28541@sakura> <87o8ri76u2.fsf@toke.dk>
 <20200423123329.GG28541@sakura> <877dy66tng.fsf@toke.dk>
 <20200423173111.GL28541@sakura>
 <A82F9728-C934-4CF1-BA37-870E82D6A05A@gmx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <A82F9728-C934-4CF1-BA37-870E82D6A05A@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP ; ns.iliad.fr ;
 Thu Apr 23 23:53:08 2020 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: [Cake] Advantages to tightly tuning latency
X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation <cake.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake>
List-Post: <mailto:cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 21:53:10 -0000


On Thursday 23 Apr 2020 à 20:30:09 (+0200), Sebastian Moeller wrote:

Hello,

> if I might ask you a tangential question, did you also look at MAP-T
> (translation) and if so, what made you choose MAP-E (encapsulation)?

decision was made a long time ago

I remember it had something to do with the fact that, at that time,
Cisco only supported MAP-E on the switches we planned to use for this,
so we did not even look at MAP-T

-- 
Maxime