From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
Cc: "Cong Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
"Jamal Hadi Salim" <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
"Jiri Pirko" <jiri@resnulli.us>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
"Jonas Köppeler" <j.koeppeler@tu-berlin.de>,
cake@lists.bufferbloat.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Cake] Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] Multi-queue aware sch_cake
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2025 18:48:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251128184852.7ceb3e72@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87cy51bxe1.fsf@toke.dk>
On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 23:33:26 +0100 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> writes:
> > On Thu, 27 Nov 2025 20:27:49 +0100 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> >> Yeah; how about I follow up with a selftest after this has been merged
> >> into both the kernel and iproute2?
> >
> > Why is iproute2 a blocker? Because you're not sure if the "API" won't
> > change or because you're worried about NIPA or.. ?
>
> No, just that the patch that adds the new qdisc to iproute2 needs to be
> merged before the selftests can use them. Which they won't be until the
> kernel patches are merged, so we'll have to follow up with the selftests
> once that has happened. IIUC, at least :)
You can add a URL to the branch with the pending iproute2 changes
when you post the selftests and we'll pull them in NIPA, or post
the patches at the same time (just not in one thread).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-29 2:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-27 9:30 [Cake] " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-11-27 9:30 ` [Cake] [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] net/sched: sch_cake: Factor out config variables into separate struct Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-11-27 9:30 ` [Cake] [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] net/sched: sch_cake: Add cake_mq qdisc for using cake on mq devices Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-11-29 2:08 ` [Cake] " Willem de Bruijn
2025-11-29 9:21 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-11-29 16:56 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-11-29 19:33 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-11-27 9:30 ` [Cake] [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] net/sched: sch_cake: Share config across cake_mq sub-qdiscs Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-11-27 9:30 ` [Cake] [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] net/sched: sch_cake: share shaper state across sub-instances of cake_mq Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-11-27 18:27 ` [Cake] Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] Multi-queue aware sch_cake Cong Wang
2025-11-27 19:27 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-11-28 17:50 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-11-28 22:33 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-11-29 2:48 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-11-29 9:25 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251128184852.7ceb3e72@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=j.koeppeler@tu-berlin.de \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=toke@toke.dk \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox