From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C51863B29D; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 10:10:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 100CC390DB; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 10:17:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 8HZevtAIife9; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 10:17:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57364390DA; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 10:17:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09170AC; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 10:09:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Michael Richardson To: David Lang , Dave Taht , Cake List , bloat In-Reply-To: References: <10241.1618866642@localhost> X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1 X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 10:09:58 -0400 Message-ID: <21914.1618927798@localhost> Subject: Re: [Cake] [Bloat] starlink testing X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:10:03 -0000 David Lang wrote: > I haven't seen any follow-ups where anyone has gotten a login to the= dish or > has sniffed the traffic between the dish and the router. True, I haven't heard, but I haven't been looking. > I haven't seen anything that would show that the router has (or does= n't have) > any awareness of the satellite network. With multi-hundred antenna to be steered, and an AMD64 CPU on board, I can= 't imagine that that CPU isn't doing some significant amount of DSP. If they had offboarded all the analog parts to another DSP or discrete log= ic, then probably they wouldn't need a 64-bit CPU onboard: they could have use= d something slower/cheaper. Well, maybe there is future proofing involved. I'm very disappointed that "Something simpler than IPv6" turned out to be = "CGN". -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networ= ks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect= [ ] mcr@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails = [