From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ed1-x533.google.com (mail-ed1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::533]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 094B93B29D for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 21:06:41 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-ed1-x533.google.com with SMTP id j13so507375edp.2 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 18:06:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=to:references:from:autocrypt:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=M/Sh336QLPHe5tQrRwGv0IkLc2xAzpWp43xyvzEnNpQ=; b=rBlnzR3Z7OL8Y/i8aZnb69+ufqHMmhBmZy1L9OIeqGbGNmyZD3Ypby++qJ+mBpdUI3 eUq0CHwNURaVfKXH9Ga1na8cQUx9oGaYgch/T2KfzeCYbES00WJQ07e7Mbe03J3X4ZYs 4gto3BKmy1bRnwDVLFHpBWYT4Va8t8ofyu1BWYX53KHHwZYmOGU295RgyycJLQAfWBNg Y69NtYDJmQxHyCtezX9dt1f67ygvfuzN6AFWxiHwb21K7ixNgr39mGSuAa5pNDp2rC+m RQV24Gm6KzXYyvu3j0H008JmbEyrg9zWdWoUSAblSidY3d2yief4sazEOdYSz/ZpNdPv UQuQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:references:from:autocrypt:subject:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=M/Sh336QLPHe5tQrRwGv0IkLc2xAzpWp43xyvzEnNpQ=; b=T+1ItWoY4I91Y2bB5xrm+jfwPhN/x5EUD9mGaX2DFbuSSuowKfHEv1PagG1FI00Og4 e26e0jR9O3GJBllYjelhGpMUdT6uPG10QV7pdHUfyJD6lciL0xP/MeUwwRkcGX1GKvqT dpUWAbYoENu+0rz0gPmCuaWJ6UpmpIsTAafKTTxefSZhX6Ez2+KnEWhYxNTozgPvIQxy aEbw7Kod84Jkn2kqeWZQizYbBy1KqVSTCcfCk754s3PURcuNPIVc3txE96yvwsoiW5ME R1DMhvbpno7Eoi2aMHHnrNxIIg3MU1yWdtIJZ4KwJH940HrH/E56sXwln6nVLMbRz3l8 rZ8g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530LFRTZaLcouiyEc3ATb+iPqTJfc53974V4VZoETgqY59/kMY50 8svzYU9beS6RuV41z6FE2CO/2ks+N+c= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwK2/Be6zfLTQYxWMXJx9MSb/Op9822iMuZlRYinFTM2zQZ2dQuCkXuD+/w/4kJysGlBVJaaA== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d651:: with SMTP id v17mr6951596edr.91.1611713200533; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 18:06:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.116] (cpe90-146-174-71.liwest.at. [90.146.174.71]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i18sm317709edt.68.2021.01.26.18.06.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 26 Jan 2021 18:06:40 -0800 (PST) To: jmarks2@gmail.com, cake@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <005701d6f442$6d620e90$48262bb0$@gmail.com> From: xnor Autocrypt: addr=xnoreq@gmail.com; keydata= xjMEX8GJihYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAhiXbV9uWXaRTLr0gtbgOSXKiajCO+q+GZ/Lanh1SeafN F3hub3IgPHhub3JlcUBnbWFpbC5jb20+wpEEExYIADkWIQSIwFsdmuvVRn8KTpQPFnChazvz EAUCX8GJigUJAeEzgAIbAwULCQgHAgYVCAkKCwIFFgIDAQAACgkQDxZwoWs78xAqlgEAlzmt RBZWsvAir0IcwvcgSZOCKzt8onO8yoMi7qq/3M4A+wWj3lX9lx0WEBZtPEJCw+WZ7+w7c6wz 4//han+cxsIEzjgEX8GJihIKKwYBBAGXVQEFAQEHQCRV3YyeTk35SbVbzBMDTPIc4L+Nuhkh tOIU4ZlXy3QoAwEIB8J+BBgWCAAmFiEEiMBbHZrr1UZ/Ck6UDxZwoWs78xAFAl/BiYoFCQHh M4ACGwwACgkQDxZwoWs78xBjpAD+LZuOaaaPgqJx/u/PxUviEjFr76XwFiwnXFSUQP9RcpIB AJEpdVrCl6fNm+QrUcjfAe7VN1IrCgeEpNA6fmz5kXEK Message-ID: <21fe9efe-cc74-0b83-f659-4778ba54d420@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 03:04:46 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <005701d6f442$6d620e90$48262bb0$@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Cake] Trouble getting decent performance with CAKE X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 02:06:42 -0000 Haven't looked at your measurements, but what's the issue? Is it=20 throughput or latency? Because I have a 750 MHz single core mips router=20 here that handles 100 Mbps... barely. Latency on ingress (and traffic shaping in general on ingress) sucks=20 compared to egress. Why is there an imq0 device? Haven't those been obsolete for several=20 years? What kernel are you running? I assume you have a filter with tc-action mirred egress set up, but just = to be sure could you post the output of: $ tc filter show dev eth0 parent ffff: Also, there's little point in having the ack-filter on on the ingress cak= e.