From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-lf0-x22f.google.com (mail-lf0-x22f.google.com
	[IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22f])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6AB921F8F0
	for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 17:14:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by lfap203 with SMTP id p203so21660790lfa.0
	for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 17:14:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
	:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
	bh=vOEQWfF7/uwKvOcCd6sS4IaZ0VptllSlBIbCf7avMzY=;
	b=oxCgwHxfXUWzJbriFlZrYrOteA6oA3MFTzdPLwmzjYCFScxli9Mh45VsWyh43ZYOOU
	XooCRH2XO38KgRuwH9asJ+5TASEGiz1K/p6+YW9JU2YdJizcKjRySUNjInRr2H6WOWth
	Q+kvqjVtgcugy7T9YYbY8SKG1Htp4n4YLrx5jK7NZNutbm945tC6gwjTvAPJEC3SxegS
	5DU04Fm96qHfAp7+E66tlVU45uBki46dNJhHBtWjOTb9+w+IuzDhFKVM24DijqqACZG5
	QwZHbe1LwknxqO2A412y57ZAArzxRDe658SnebSearQvOuwZLX3+E9ElXroB36CpArpY
	DzZg==
X-Received: by 10.25.15.22 with SMTP id e22mr8925979lfi.92.1449882883004;
	Fri, 11 Dec 2015 17:14:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bass.home.chromatix.fi (37-33-99-74.bb.dnainternet.fi.
	[37.33.99.74]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
	rb3sm3613358lbb.18.2015.12.11.17.14.41
	(version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128);
	Fri, 11 Dec 2015 17:14:42 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <56695F78.5020802@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 03:14:38 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <23E92D62-F9BF-471D-8092-B21A23EDECA1@gmail.com>
References: <5664173D.40808@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>
	<56695F78.5020802@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>
To: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] dscp & tunneling
X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation <cake.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cake>,
	<mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake>
List-Post: <mailto:cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake>,
	<mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 01:15:08 -0000


> On 10 Dec, 2015, at 13:18, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant =
<kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> wrote:
>=20
> This would be a fairly pointless
> exercise as cake has already classified the tunnel as it's a single =
flow
> (from my router to the tunnel server) and no amount of dscp bit =
fiddling
> from inner to outer headers is going to make different parts of the
> tunnel flow move to different cake tins.

Not true - Cake interprets the DSCP field *before* looking at flows.  =
There=92s a separate flow system for each tin.

That=92s on top of the magic that flow_dissect does.

 - Jonathan Morton