From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-x431.google.com (mail-wr1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::431]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8432E3B29D for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 06:08:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x431.google.com with SMTP id m12so10341660wru.12 for ; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 03:08:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heistp.net; s=google; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pk8fW1GBwP/khvuthl/q4HYfcWxhvs2/JM19MfPMNbk=; b=NZ79pTnjDNv64qbuZnwatD19JoPztADgdX9RQRuyS2/nUZ1yQBv9AQkTWOjWhhJAgV ej7XfqCQHTtwjGGWZ0Hz4qIXQlJOw5jPkxyWn9vCvJbUM1t97MOsNM4G9+b0G5Yylp8M eDw1+iK6ATIyKhZuWvRY8cIgnA3CegwaC+xOYe4xsnVoe46UIE4/X0JdiNDY2tpfGHha 6t6NWIxlwM0XWOE/3H3lY2Jvnvc4Si8CRocjEKIXd2OUbvAA6jTwcgQZ3zJZopaxY7E/ XMRpkhr2P/FZJowpgk+9Yupyp3M0y4gHcqsr7eYFc3hqnuGVeZ9FW9++cAjFHVS6t58n kQOA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pk8fW1GBwP/khvuthl/q4HYfcWxhvs2/JM19MfPMNbk=; b=pu1sxU0vgv7QPYtzM9bKHmWth85O30YPPJVq5GmtAq7P6QI3VBUijkzJ/yZdgy1EjS YnZriCA7vLJJ5gdrMs2/Lu+VIjYd05GyJMShsknkZ1/2JGwQSxPHcdFTv/T3CYOzlaed M2eb0pMuV6DXuPJwkWJmCrvZzKTXVlY9IiHXbYoOP5Lqs4J1WamHH9//aNBeYYQFoS3v 24FXjsSJQdI3lwjs4PVfL9lm6Hz26uM7i6/1mG6PwUf3yCguTQFiwzzIYvRPJfX1Qg15 dxtcVlifZ2yBwMTQ+Npi8HmwvBaZHjWLaTiorN1AtruHFZdbjiRr0UcyonR+YnvkxkS0 OBjA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530G36Zcz8BeQMtT2bHUHMR+zxroU6a+9/5sul2LlMZyggmEyAYY 7nGRPjnZDUkdjQRCiw4MSNk6zg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzS11kLh9r/HdvnOV2hZriIHvlcbRiki2/wLxEeMDU+22xKM8nJ0f7Nje95Wvuk4dRtL2y9jg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:59aa:: with SMTP id p10mr9995046wrr.0.1628244497147; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 03:08:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.72.0.81] (h-1169.lbcfree.net. [185.193.85.130]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p2sm9251816wrr.21.2021.08.06.03.08.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 06 Aug 2021 03:08:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <23c5c22159479906817d8680cbeedbcc75cd8009.camel@heistp.net> From: Pete Heist To: Toke =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen?= Cc: Cake List Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 12:08:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87im0k54ab.fsf@toke.dk> References: <3ebc0a3ccdcfa67a48c5ad764ce3389782633fef.camel@heistp.net> <87r1f95und.fsf@toke.dk> <5964374bee9979ee9f1b4b86d32b002722d628fc.camel@heistp.net> <37822e2cebd977f2c5c0758b48a191f2644d7589.camel@heistp.net> <87im0k54ab.fsf@toke.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.40.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Cake] cake srchost/dsthost stopped working? X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 10:08:18 -0000 Fyi I threw the test script up in a repo, so in case we need to test the flow isolation keywords again we can just run that: https://github.com/heistp/cake-flowiso Pete On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 16:56 +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > Pete Heist writes: > > > As for triple-isolate, I added a test Jon suggested: > > > > "I would recommend a W configuration of flows > > > > one of the three hosts sends to or from both of the two hosts, while > > the other two send to or from only one each > > > > this should result in the two hosts getting equal throughput each, > > and > > equal throughput in each of their two flows" > > > > This is the last test in the output, and I think the behavior looks > > correct for both the unpatched and patched versions: > > > > https://www.heistp.net/downloads/cake-hostfair/cake-hostfair-unpatched.txt > > > > https://www.heistp.net/downloads/cake-hostfair/cake-hostfair-patched.txt > > > > Thanks guys, and that, I believe, is finally it for now... :) > > Awesome, thank you both! I'll send a proper patch upstream :) > > -Toke