From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-x231.google.com (mail-wm0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB2583B2A4 for ; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 15:58:34 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-wm0-x231.google.com with SMTP id r68so23173302wmr.0 for ; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 12:58:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=BegOB74DPwTLan8QU9BNdfW+VlAjukEMFY3idKLYiCc=; b=YYBvl5YQvEbIyESbDq26VvChdjrXOKY46RkUG+lYNT+2OwmNHvcQ8uUpfMiFfb8wUn OBnGdoZTUkMxMBThE4Anewfz4rHRbO05fm32qOgOVYBGesie347Q0RwBykI8POnKOElp v9vtFGtPq8Jj0HaLBhBGIlG0YEEzjmel6smcQbM9ik4gP925keOZ3z+05MOEo/kUrvf1 76cRYJyf4ovQ6IPCpx5s/0dv68dmb8BW+Gbh8McCiQUDZAAve1eDNfjkl9L3MdvrvKHN 0hwOBC8obtI2erxJLCz4nXc1HjV2QxYr4Vdqw6ZTWmECwzvElO8vMve7nsqWa5qBNmoH 4PiA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=BegOB74DPwTLan8QU9BNdfW+VlAjukEMFY3idKLYiCc=; b=dT2oxghMIt2x9WNnGvUrlZndlqqqF38Xoq85bafrkwJCBcIXOgTGM+XMxtEs2D+dph XvIwq8wRxIJQsFwbJqrzd8e3IOvDRkNGJqF7L4vupEd3R/EY573vfrcRTWuQJsPNxkTt aKEqbTPGhK/nJh32vq5UMCRxicpYHsBXDzwfvRM2e8NiyJ5JADQBw9DexgZpTu+UWkNy BbFdlf+rJDJ6pNXAdyQkue0gDihpR+7UIVQr8OqKsZ+RAdIFXOlye4zNDe1RSvqcpDjM u8qDUi+erkjb50FlnlwleZJ81TdvlP/vTdMsbAOweqkdIQ5rMLnSkLf7fsP/8GXF4Ctu 2FnA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX7LjGVRVDnt7/vTR1QWuzWMY7zlk5SSH56iS0/0Ag/J1auX5TUF xcIelthbjtGg5tILaGJAQgc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMaqHIE7+zPgkHD/zI2ZlUGIPVGGYJ2cowqY5/BmvrHU3ryPVI1PFZTjj/7kUqoIBs6w2nFuWQ== X-Received: by 10.28.26.194 with SMTP id a185mr2404580wma.124.1510779513808; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 12:58:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.72.0.130] (h-1169.lbcfree.net. [185.99.119.68]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 90sm5049440wrp.93.2017.11.15.12.58.32 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Nov 2017 12:58:33 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B0AD00CB-E362-455A-A07A-DA7814C1262C" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) From: Pete Heist In-Reply-To: <1510777703.2726870.1173824208.148E1D2D@webmail.messagingengine.com> Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 21:58:32 +0100 Cc: Dave Taht , cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Message-Id: <246DB6BC-8045-47F6-8719-8CBDE3E776AD@gmail.com> References: <87vaic8vv1.fsf@nemesis.taht.net> <87bmk372du.fsf_-_@nemesis.taht.net> <87lgj75m74.fsf@nemesis.taht.net> <1510777703.2726870.1173824208.148E1D2D@webmail.messagingengine.com> To: Nils Andreas Svee X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) Subject: Re: [Cake] Cake upstream Planning X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 20:58:34 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_B0AD00CB-E362-455A-A07A-DA7814C1262C Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > On Nov 15, 2017, at 9:28 PM, Nils Andreas Svee = wrote: >=20 > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017, at 21:19, Dave Taht wrote: >>=20 >>> There=E2=80=99s also been a Cake support feature request hanging = around in the EdgeOS >>> forums for a while after Lochnair=E2=80=99s successful work to get = it built for the >>> EdgeRouter firmware: >>>=20 >>> = https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeMAX-Feature-Requests/Cake-shaper-support= /idi-p/1885749 >>=20 >> I had viewed those folk as a key path to commercialization. They have >> a great user community and great products. >>=20 >>> Maybe this would help get it pushed through into a device that I = think has >>> pretty wide deployment=E2=80=A6 >>=20 >> The problem is, they were stuck on kernel 3.10, when last I looked = and >> oy... >>=20 >> I keep hoping we can get cavium to pay attention directly. > Sadly they're still stuck 3.10. The next FW will be based on the > 3.10.107 kernel, instead of 3.10.14/3.10.20. So that's something, but > it's still ancient and EOL. Is the tie to 3.10 due to the dependency on the Cavium SDK for hardware = support? Surprisingly I don=E2=80=99t see a feature request so far for a newer = kernel, at least among the first half dozen pages or so: = https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeMAX-Feature-Requests/idb-p/EdgeMAX_Ideas= /tab/most-kudoed = --Apple-Mail=_B0AD00CB-E362-455A-A07A-DA7814C1262C Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
On Nov 15, 2017, at 9:28 PM, Nils Andreas Svee <nils@stokkdalen.no> = wrote:

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017, at 21:19, Dave Taht wrote:

There=E2=80=99s also been a Cake support = feature request hanging around in the EdgeOS
forums for a = while after Lochnair=E2=80=99s successful work to get it built for = the
EdgeRouter firmware:

https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeMAX-Feature-Requests/Cake-sha= per-support/idi-p/1885749

I = had viewed those folk as a key path to commercialization. They have
a great user community and great products.

Maybe this would help = get it pushed through into a device that I think has
pretty = wide deployment=E2=80=A6

The = problem is, they were stuck on kernel 3.10, when last I looked and
oy...

I keep hoping we can get = cavium to pay attention directly.
Sadly = they're still stuck 3.10. The next FW will be based on the
3.10.107 kernel, instead of 3.10.14/3.10.20. So that's = something, but
it's still ancient and EOL.

Is the tie to 3.10 due to the dependency on the Cavium SDK = for hardware support?

Surprisingly I don=E2=80=99t see a feature request so far for = a newer kernel, at least among the first half dozen pages or = so:

https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeMAX-Feature-Requests/idb-p/Ed= geMAX_Ideas/tab/most-kudoed

= --Apple-Mail=_B0AD00CB-E362-455A-A07A-DA7814C1262C--