From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38C3F21F917 for ; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 12:19:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hms-beagle.home.lan ([217.237.70.193]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Ld0jY-1YauXe1MLw-00iG4k; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 21:19:34 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) From: Sebastian Moeller In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 21:19:28 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2BE70C89-86F7-43F8-8AFE-FFA524189408@gmx.de> References: <4D4A16C4-46C4-4910-B13F-86B6C658E5E2@gmx.de> <1437845902806.eb7f6ec8@Nodemailer> <9039450E-CDB9-41D0-BACF-4B72FAC98D6D@gmx.de> To: Alec Robertson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:qiu4UuzNV6XTpIlB6TPTv31OCD1DkiuFIrk/HtpsLNrNBlHp4dm 1TCIzBfX2XXfg5pzkZsXC/ExgdnmCGftFAGWIFUYUCMI75/otwpK+CogNLVvv6NoX7q3wBX QLFKx3HQcwkc2rDMwGuVGOAnNzb8mu5XXNBRaNigZcJTGbpQXqCN17uowXnQjGICcjMjZpi w42ArwOaR56lKNgBlK9jw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:c1lv+huJKx4=:zwE46OqzA17mYFy/Ec2IfP ZaocAYiak7uTBVjRw0zdtt7WmM4/yHcAUFBcEMaz2yXBeNSYDhV1qt5ug5XRRAnBqJsPSgEj/ zfGkRKFVOWS75xB2QGaZ4efG1GGQVw3jdJhS+JpUMZ/KOMARwivCKCoEYUZqqYd2oVE/4M8nX 9s214dGInGrT8PoPXYVWkst8UsRop36BvBkf8+OIf1Xtoqp5UzjlhEJ5UGOXyGvwXnruFmXu0 Zvg7BsxPdzGJEQLiHs1p+O2Mgv18vDlO4nbkGNNYLFpBzoXa0wqgfvylEWYFrXxxo9iiqXXKc rBZ7nb2MjgqWRqP/GAZLDK28urFVCJXimbYoJeYClTrKT9Fzrr1LB3RJFnRLfUDofoKt623Cs 6FNrSrY8hlsaLouGJcclpSZGHlQPJdvcQKsA0DYOxOk8HWJbEhMQ5+Mqezj0jxMSEpHfxGUec 80S8oh/WC3Sh3NRZ7rYTp1gb470nIx58o2lD2TqTxnqDRbXCC9nBnW37W1HabOvfzL2zGntdc f3qYyZ63IGgyLJ1h1zkkORN6VVFD/ZwCEPg5MXXMK/U+bmRgLlflnqvDxntU+yNs98Sm6JssR WAB3afQ/9aztWd28+4CTvsTVb8blCKvP2KEjh6L1P+LOb7i+0vHRBLADvTPClSv5yssM56VqV fxaEsUuKvEYJi1+TExxnXeNNAMd6vWYKHGPp/ppcZKoS6eZ0vTDv+xqudxhxB7LuC2S8= Cc: Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cake] How to test Cake on TP-Link WDR3600 X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 19:20:05 -0000 Hi Alec, On Jul 25, 2015, at 20:57 , Alec Robertson = wrote: > That's it, it's all showing up now. >=20 > I will try it out right away. What should I be testing and looking out = for? 1) test whether using cake as link layer adaptation mechanism works: put = in a number for overhead and run =93tc -d qdisc=94 and post the output = of: a) cat /etc/config/sqm b) /etc/init.d/sqm stop ; tc -d qdisc c) /etc/init.d/sqm start ; tc -d qdisc 2) test whether you like the performance under load, = http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest is a good start, registered (for = free) users can change the configuration, I like to use 16 streams for = upstream and downstream each and I like the =93Hi-Res BufferBloat: = (10hz check)=94 option. 3) test even more, have a loo at flent (https://flent.org), especially = the rrul test has been a real help in understanding link behavior under = load. Please note, piece_of_cake will only use 1 priority for all packets (so = effectively no priority), layer_cake.qos will by default, use 4 = different priority layers, so expect some difference between layer_cake = and piece_of_cake in the rrul results... Best Regards Sebastian > _______________________________________________ > Cake mailing list > Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake