From: Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottschall@newmedia-net.de>
To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] Patch "sch_cake: avoid possible divide by zero in cake_enqueue()" has been added to the 4.19-stable tree
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 13:47:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2c75f117-30de-8d79-1637-f9a155c38e7a@newmedia-net.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5FGuyFhkej_V7wQXgGx6+dwve7fVj6+X0OZcO68GEhYA@mail.gmail.com>
dd-wrt has it already :-)
Am 11.01.2020 um 22:38 schrieb Dave Taht:
> Thank you for all the gymnastics to keep cake alive in openwrt.
>
> I would still like there to be a sce branch of the out of tree work
> that I could point people at
> in my lca talk this week, but I understand that's increasingly difficult.
>
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 1:20 PM Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant
> <ldir@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 11 Jan 2020, at 20:40, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> did this make it into openwrt already?
>> It’s complicated and it depends what you mean by openwrt.
>>
>> First off, the fix relates to auto-bandwith mode or whatever it’s called and I don’t think many people use it. Nonetheless:
>>
>> Is the fix in ’net-next’: yes
>> Is the fix in 4.19 stable: In the queue for 4.19.95
>>
>> Is openwrt on 4.19.95: No
>> Does openwrt use the in-tree version of Cake?: No
>>
>> Is the fix in the Out-Of-Tree cake git repo: Yes
>>
>> Has the openwrt CAKE package been bumped to follow cake git repo?: master, yes, as of 2020/01/11 (earlier today)
>>
>> OpenWrt 19.07 has just been released, its concept of cake package has not been bumped. Neither has 18.06.
>>
>>
>> It is worth noting that until yesterday/recently the out of tree cake repo had residue in it from some experimental stuff (SCE & updating conntrack marks) and did not represent upstream in-tree CAKE anyway. That situation was corrected AFAIK completely this morning.
>>
>> Ideally I would like openwrt to use the in-tree CAKE, with ‘feature backports’ from later kernels as backport patches. Unfortunately some targets in openwrt are still on 4.14 kernels so there is no in-tree CAKE to use. Dropping CAKE from pre 4.19 kernels caused a bit of an outcry when I did it, so the next idea was to have a choice of cake kernel module for K4.19 targets, in-tree & out-of-tree CAKE. Unfortunately that exposed a weakness in package dependency selection, so that idea hasn’t flown either. I’m afraid enthusiasm levels then dropped.
>>
>>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-16 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-11 8:18 gregkh
2020-01-11 20:40 ` Dave Taht
2020-01-11 21:20 ` Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant
2020-01-11 21:38 ` Dave Taht
2020-01-12 9:53 ` Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant
2020-01-16 12:47 ` Sebastian Gottschall [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2c75f117-30de-8d79-1637-f9a155c38e7a@newmedia-net.de \
--to=s.gottschall@newmedia-net.de \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox