From: Alan Jenkins <alan.christopher.jenkins@gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] ack filter rrul result at 1000/100
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 12:47:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2d7bb753-4230-d601-1f18-e8e97a388278@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7735C7B6-8608-45BB-9FC2-71BF4E293E52@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1330 bytes --]
On 16/11/17 09:24, Pete Heist wrote:
>
>> From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com <mailto:dave.taht@gmail.com>>
>> To: Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> <mailto:cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>>
>> Subject: Re: [Cake] ack filter rrul result at 1000/100
>> Message-ID:
>> <CAA93jw7sxna2Ot=Q86LaTGN+2z2Y=NzdV2-EcqU6ypkc6=DbTw@mail.gmail.com
>> <mailto:CAA93jw7sxna2Ot=Q86LaTGN+2z2Y=NzdV2-EcqU6ypkc6=DbTw@mail.gmail.com>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> This is a much saner test result[1], showing about a 20% improvement
>> under the rrul_be test. I scaled back the topology to two instances of
>> cake on the middlebox, shaping to 100mbits on one side and 10mbits on
>> the other, and flipped filtering on or off. The win will improve more
>> with upload/download ratios of ever worse than 10/1, and the rrul is
>> not exactly a test of real traffic.
>>
>> What other ratios are out there, particularly in the dsl world?
>
> That’s quite nice. Attached is the ADSL connection info for what I had
> before I found FreeNet. I don’t miss this connection at all, _except_
> that it might have been nice for testing this. 2048 / 135 kbit, that’s
> around 15 : 1.
I have a good UK ADSL2+ connection, which I am shaping at 15:0.9 mbit,
using a LEDE box. The raw sync rates are a bit more asymmetric too.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2734 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-16 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.1021.1510806526.3609.cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2017-11-16 9:24 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-16 12:47 ` Alan Jenkins [this message]
2017-11-16 3:13 Dave Taht
2017-11-16 3:45 ` Dave Taht
2017-11-16 4:28 ` Dave Taht
2017-11-16 11:30 ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-11-16 13:55 ` Bret Towe
2017-11-16 14:29 ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-11-16 14:33 ` Bret Towe
2017-11-16 15:03 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-11-16 16:25 ` Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2d7bb753-4230-d601-1f18-e8e97a388278@gmail.com \
--to=alan.christopher.jenkins@gmail.com \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox