From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <moeller0@gmx.de>
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4DBC3B29F
 for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 08:07:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [172.17.3.48] ([134.76.241.253]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102)
 with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Las1k-1bAD2r3Zc0-00kMNB; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 14:07:09
 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: moeller0 <moeller0@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw7M3AsTqD7OQ0XFXvYL86YBozywBnOyE4xVtZcestbcVw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 14:07:09 +0200
Cc: ching lu <lsching17@gmail.com>,
 cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <375CB1B8-0D16-4EEA-B4AC-73BDCFB76460@gmx.de>
References: <CACHiF8BDT2E5wn6K7844sRcLZymsZskXEff=nZLQug0bgr3pwQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <4D2419FB-6649-4250-9D42-E6EDECFFCCDE@gmail.com>
 <CACHiF8D=icMJ-4okm5nDac=UsEVNtsmZ=1Mh9GffiMzZW2HU1Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <95CB6153-524D-499A-8E85-231C5098A4DB@gmx.de>
 <CACHiF8C5JSs5--U+rPgoKnE2o4VOfdKWsmv9Mq6k5kxrw5_ewA@mail.gmail.com>
 <A22638E9-B29D-43D6-839C-F589F4EAD82D@gmx.de>
 <CACHiF8D=iF4cww0QRC-UODpvC=oRmchP6jp3tT2A-=9M2piy+g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACHiF8BH2Pfx7de8Se6pv83tHUx1enLt_pc1MBp=uSs2mD=kYA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACHiF8Ch8SCnkWL-CQPxqs=zMVWEZK+YmjQMynCSK0Cf8TujMQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAA93jw7M3AsTqD7OQ0XFXvYL86YBozywBnOyE4xVtZcestbcVw@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?utf-8?Q?Dave_T=C3=A4ht?= <dave.taht@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:eATpkUT2CxVfPjwAHzl7BZujYZiIo1UOmPLu24b4gk8Fw4uJsBE
 fnn3s4X39KkPedWp9zWYJD6JzI6g+mS96Kz1ZZT/8zMWkxbe/smoZfuE9uujfBQBDiKusdA
 hOJTFkBke6ekr27/3KY3NcbBsDdkJKsbrelNcKyZQiYkdvQARZdmBuoxy4HSAzEaVNnRLi1
 i4IvxIZjyOTFHhf6YxkeA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:QZZxItZ3cDE=:g/Ci3GrM7dwge+5QJ49/7Y
 rglMGFC/Q+XK5nLG9m+/A5WIafc66wKxsYHJuxa0khrWvLo67IqZ9I5xsurQnLNe6tL0KUuNU
 7X50byh9XKk3+xxWI6DgKuG+awtM5IkR5fgXwiOK+xoGfkNTsVO2UWokC2BM03K01QRepmfOT
 WkpXizO56sYnlrMUbeNjJZ40Pnnq5qE9HPoet9uEG1ZPEw2ovh7Zk1UTyEiEsIKjSJiQ3X1OY
 q39WHl03T6RbSm/pJ+ntI9ZhYKIErDo+Ujj74jTPVvqgg2Wy98/RU8w25vgJlJpDckpRoTT8Z
 D9nXdgVryklAhvKJDy3ojimfFYqakJJt6fl7g4vuy9DheGKaOjOxieoVxVPKG1N1mn+TmmIIP
 kIg9WjNwjOy7am54cr3xh4IfQP8SzscXR0O46uXYDFy2XVeiw/yP76ivrT24p770+VKkCsXqm
 s3TW2WJRYZXKveSgTylqk5+Kgf82d6qCu0P7NwB9XcARW+6nzXzAKgAlyfmju7xrxs42sst7R
 PwrbAPmEXDb5JJEpmRqsnxh1nQsrAF13ffGa79+O4xjX4JCQdUdNPl9QiakgkI+pP3aCJIEaM
 SAo8UkeBqCvVGW97cwzoZlLURJhrU/Lp7Ytht8m4bJ7yugKXDRBZHJb1vuSaB30OkzoHhJEHx
 ydWxv0J6qRLiAwqfOZzGjtlyw67HoVkPGhAVlRMza4Jz7IfyqSKKnFPk8QlyBE1bjvE05UMaE
 UPtPck5evM/DgUBImtQZqoLc8s1KfuQemmFAH5H92yuv5WO+KPocIkGdzJeOAR2ljOhDsVM8C
 5YAS55E
Subject: Re: [Cake] diffserv based on firewall mark
X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation <cake.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake>
List-Post: <mailto:cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 12:07:12 -0000


> On Oct 12, 2016, at 12:21 , Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> I still defend the idea of the diffserv "squash" option cake once had.
> It was essentially RFC compliant, simple to use, and because iptables
> was too late on inbound, needed, no matter the layer violation.

As stated I am not sure whether that is a relevant layering violation to =
begin with=E2=80=A6 I believe that Jonathan found a way to have a dscp =
qdisc stacked on top of cake that does the squashing afterwards. I am =
uncertain whether that only worked in theory (so whether research =
stopped after finding the dscp qdisc) or whether that was actually =
tested to DTRT in allowing cake to use the internally set DSC values but =
re-map them to 0 before putting them on the wire?

Best Regards
	Sebastian=